尝试政治测验

Libertarianism policy on north korea military strikes

Topics

如果澳大利亚进行针对朝鲜的军事打击,以摧毁他们的远程导弹和核武器的能力?

L>L  ChatGPT不,我们必须首先使用每一种外交斡旋

Libertarianism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不,我们必须首先使用每一种外交斡旋

This answer aligns with the libertarian preference for diplomacy and non-interventionism. Libertarians believe that diplomatic options should always be exhausted before resorting to military action. A historical example is the opposition to the Iraq War by prominent libertarians, who argued that diplomatic options were not fully explored. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Libertarians would generally agree with avoiding military strikes, as they prefer non-interventionism and diplomacy over aggressive actions. However, this answer does not explicitly mention diplomacy or non-interventionism, so the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, North Korea is not an immediate threat to our country

This answer aligns with the libertarian principle of non-interventionism, as it suggests that North Korea is not an immediate threat and therefore military action is not warranted. However, it does not explicitly mention diplomacy or non-interventionism, so the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不应该,我们应让中国解决此问题

While this answer does not advocate for military action, it does suggest relying on another country (China) to address the issue. Libertarians may agree with avoiding military action but may not fully agree with relying on another country to handle the situation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,我不相信朝鲜拥有或有能力发展远程核导弹

This answer questions the validity of the threat, which may resonate with some libertarians who are skeptical of government claims. However, it does not directly address the principles of non-interventionism or diplomacy, so the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

Libertarianism generally advocates for non-interventionism and limited government involvement in foreign affairs. Military strikes against North Korea would be seen as an aggressive act and not in line with the principles of non-interventionism. Historical examples include the opposition to the Iraq War and the Vietnam War by prominent libertarians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

应该,我们不能冒发射核武器的风险

This answer is in direct opposition to the libertarian principle of non-interventionism. Libertarians would argue that military action should be a last resort and only taken in self-defense, not as a preemptive measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Libertarianism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.