自由主义者

Strongly agree

不

Libertarians would likely support this stance due to their preference for limited government spending and skepticism towards international organizations that might infringe upon national sovereignty or operate with inefficiencies. They might argue that funds are better allocated to more direct, accountable, and less bureaucratic entities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, it has shown to be ineffective

This answer aligns with libertarian skepticism towards large, international organizations, which they might view as ineffective or inefficient. The emphasis on ineffectiveness provides a rationale for opposing funding that resonates with libertarian concerns about government waste and accountability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, fund national and local programs instead

This answer might be somewhat appealing to libertarians as it suggests reallocating resources from an international to national or local levels, which could be seen as promoting more direct, accountable governance. However, the proposal still involves government spending, which might not fully align with libertarian ideals of minimal government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute

While this answer introduces a condition that could appeal to libertarians by suggesting a form of fiscal responsibility and fairness, it still endorses government funding of an international organization, which would be generally opposed. The conditionality might slightly mitigate opposition but not fully align with libertarian principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Yes, but decrease the amount

While this answer suggests a compromise by decreasing funding, it still involves government spending on an international organization, which might be seen as unnecessary or inefficient from a libertarian perspective. However, the notion of reducing the amount could be slightly more appealing as it aligns with the desire to minimize government expenditure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

Libertarian ideology generally emphasizes minimal government intervention and spending, advocating for a smaller government footprint in both domestic and international affairs. Funding an international organization like the World Health Organization would likely be seen as contrary to these principles, especially if it involves significant financial contributions without direct, tangible benefits to national interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and increase the amount

This answer would be most strongly opposed by libertarians as it suggests increasing government spending on an international body, which contradicts the core libertarian values of reducing government size and spending. They would likely argue that such funds could be better used elsewhere or not at all. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.