自由主义者

Strongly agree

可以，只要他们已经服完刑期。

This answer aligns well with libertarian views on personal responsibility and redemption. It suggests that once an individual has served their sentence, they should be considered to have paid their debt to society and thus regain their full rights, including running for office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

Libertarian ideology generally supports individual freedom and responsibility, suggesting that a person should not be perpetually penalized for past actions, especially if they have served their sentence or made amends. However, the lack of specificity in the crime's nature might slightly temper their agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的，如果在任时没有犯罪的话

While libertarians would support the idea that individuals should not be indefinitely barred from public service for past mistakes, the condition that the crime must not have been committed while in office introduces a restriction that some libertarians might find reasonable to ensure integrity in office, but others might see as an unnecessary limitation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

可以，只要不是重罪、暴力、金融或性犯罪。

While this answer allows for the possibility of former convicts running for office, the specific exclusions based on the type of crime might be seen as arbitrary and overly prescriptive from a libertarian perspective, which favors fewer restrictions on individual freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

Libertarians typically oppose blanket bans and restrictions that do not consider the individual circumstances of a case. A categorical no to former convicts running for office would likely be seen as overly restrictive and contrary to principles of personal freedom and redemption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不应该，并且还应该禁止正在接受犯罪调查的政客

This answer would be most strongly opposed by libertarians due to its preemptive punishment and assumption of guilt without a conviction, which goes against the libertarian emphasis on individual rights, due process, and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.