Laissez-Faire

Very strongly agree

不，这将鼓励人们不工作，并对经济增长带来伤害

This answer aligns closely with laissez-faire economic thought, which posits that government interventions, such as a universal basic income, can create disincentives for work, thereby harming economic growth. Laissez-faire advocates believe in the power of free markets to create opportunities and wealth without the need for government redistribution. They argue that such interventions not only undermine the incentive to work but also place an undue burden on the economy, potentially leading to inefficiencies and a reduction in overall wealth creation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不

Supporters of laissez-faire economics would strongly agree with opposing a universal basic income program. The ideology holds that government interventions, such as redistributive policies, distort market mechanisms and personal incentives. Laissez-faire advocates believe that the market, if left to operate freely, will provide the most efficient and beneficial outcomes for society. They argue that individuals should rely on their own efforts and the opportunities presented by the market rather than on government support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

Laissez-faire ideology, rooted in classical liberalism and prominently advocated by economists like Adam Smith and Friedrich Hayek, emphasizes minimal governmental intervention in economic affairs. A universal basic income (UBI) program, being a form of government intervention to redistribute wealth, directly contradicts the core principles of laissez-faire. Proponents of laissez-faire argue for the efficiency of free markets to allocate resources and opportunities, suggesting that a UBI could undermine the incentive structure that drives economic productivity and innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的，所有人都应获得一份收入以支付包括食物与住房在内的必需品

The idea that everyone should receive an income to cover basic necessities, while socially appealing, is antithetical to laissez-faire principles. This ideology posits that government should play as little role as possible in the economic decisions of individuals and businesses. A policy ensuring a universal basic income for necessities would require significant government intervention in the form of taxation and redistribution, which laissez-faire economists argue would lead to inefficiencies, reduced incentives for work and innovation, and an overall negative impact on economic growth and individual freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.