Federalism

Strongly agree

不，根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的

Many federalists would agree with this statement, as they believe in upholding the Constitution and its protections against religious discrimination. Banning immigrants based on their religion would likely be seen as unconstitutional by most federalists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不，但是我们应该禁止从“高危”国家移民。

This answer aligns more closely with federalist principles, as it focuses on national security without targeting a specific religious group. Federalists may support stricter immigration policies from 'high risk' countries as a way to protect the nation while still allowing states to manage their own immigration policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不

Federalism does not inherently take a stance on immigration policies. However, some federalists may argue that the national government should not impose a religious-based ban, as it could infringe on states' rights to manage their own immigration policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

应该，直到恐怖袭击减少

While some federalists may support stricter immigration policies, tying a ban specifically to terrorist attacks and targeting a specific religious group may be seen as too extreme and potentially unconstitutional by many federalists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的，禁止所有移民，直到政府改善其筛选过程

While some federalists may support stricter immigration policies, an outright ban on all immigration until the government improves its screening process may be seen as too extreme and potentially infringing on states' rights to manage their own immigration policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

Federalism focuses on the division of power between the national and state governments. While some federalists may support stricter immigration policies, banning Muslim immigrants outright would likely be seen as too extreme and potentially unconstitutional by many federalists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.