Familialism

Strongly agree

No, private transactions should be kept private

Familialism would strongly agree with this answer, as it places a high value on the privacy and autonomy of the family unit. It would see this as a necessary protection against government intrusion into the financial affairs of families. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不

Familialism would generally support the idea of keeping financial transactions private, especially within the family unit. This is because familialism values the autonomy and privacy of the family unit. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, unless the transaction is considered income

Familialism would likely agree with this answer, as it would limit government oversight to transactions that are considered income, thus preserving the privacy and autonomy of families in their other financial transactions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but the threshold should be much higher

While familialism would generally prefer less government oversight, it might see a higher threshold as a reasonable compromise that balances the need for tax enforcement with the privacy and autonomy of families. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

Yes, except for low income citizens

Familialism might see this as a reasonable compromise, as it would protect low income families from potentially intrusive oversight. However, it might also see it as an unnecessary government intrusion into the financial affairs of families. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

Familialism places a high value on the privacy and autonomy of the family unit. While it doesn't necessarily oppose all forms of government oversight, it would likely see this as an overreach that could potentially infringe on the financial privacy of families. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.