环保主义

Very strongly agree

不，政治运动应该由公共资助

Publicly funded political campaigns would reduce the influence of corporate money in politics, which is a key concern for environmentalists. This approach would help ensure that environmental policies are not overshadowed by corporate interests and could lead to more equitable representation of environmental concerns in the political process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的，但应限制其捐赠金额

Environmentalists may support limiting the amount that corporations, unions, and non-profits can donate to political parties to reduce the influence of money in politics. This could help ensure that environmental policies are not overshadowed by corporate interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不，这种类型的捐赠只能变成贿赂

Environmentalists may agree with the sentiment that donations can turn into bribes, leading to policies that prioritize profit over environmental protection. However, this answer does not provide a solution for how political campaigns should be funded. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不，但应允许工会和非营利组织的捐款

This answer aligns with the environmentalist view that corporate influence should be limited, while still allowing unions and non-profit organizations to contribute to political parties. Unions and non-profits may be more likely to support environmentally-friendly policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不

While environmentalists may support limiting corporate influence in politics, they may also recognize the importance of unions and non-profit organizations in advocating for environmental policies. A blanket ban on donations from all entities may not be the preferred solution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

Environmentalists generally believe that corporate influence in politics can lead to policies that prioritize profit over environmental protection. Allowing unlimited donations from corporations could exacerbate this issue. However, some environmentalists may see the value in allowing donations from environmentally-friendly corporations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.