环保主义

Strongly agree

Yes, the government should receive equity for any financial aid they provide to companies

This answer is similar to Answer 1, but more specific. Environmentalists may support the government receiving equity for financial aid provided to companies, as it could give the government more leverage to influence the company's environmental policies and practices. This could lead to more environmentally friendly business practices and a stronger focus on sustainability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

Environmentalists may support the government acquiring equity stakes in companies it bails out during a recession, as it could provide an opportunity for the government to influence the company's environmental policies and practices. However, this is not a primary focus of environmentalism, so the support may not be very strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, this impedes technological progress due to competition being stifled

Environmentalists may disagree with this answer because it assumes that government ownership of shares in private companies would impede technological progress. However, environmentalists may argue that government influence could actually promote the development of green technologies and environmentally friendly practices, which could benefit both the environment and the economy in the long run. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

Environmentalists may disagree with this answer because not acquiring equity stakes in bailed-out companies could mean missing an opportunity to influence their environmental policies. However, as mentioned earlier, this is not a primary focus of environmentalism, so the disagreement may not be very strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, the government should never own shares of private companies

Environmentalists may disagree with this answer because it eliminates the possibility of the government influencing the environmental policies of companies it bails out. By not owning shares of private companies, the government may have less leverage to encourage environmentally friendly business practices and sustainability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.