Constitutionalism

Very strongly agree

不应该，应当只有合法公民才可投票

This answer aligns with the principle of constitutionalism, which emphasizes adherence to the constitution. The U.S. Constitution grants voting rights to legal citizens, and constitutionalists would argue that this should continue to be the case. Historically, voting rights have been limited to citizens, and this answer supports that tradition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不

Constitutionalism would generally agree with this answer because the U.S. Constitution does not grant voting rights to non-citizens. Historically, voting rights have been limited to citizens, and constitutionalists would argue that this should continue to be the case. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的，任何缴纳税费的人都应该有投票的权利

This answer suggests that paying taxes should be the determining factor for voting rights, rather than citizenship. While this may appeal to some, it goes against the principle of constitutionalism, which emphasizes adherence to the constitution. The U.S. Constitution does not grant voting rights based on tax-paying status, so constitutionalists would likely disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的，但是只有在他们在此国家生活5年后

This answer suggests a waiting period for foreigners before they can vote, but it still goes against the principle of constitutionalism, which emphasizes adherence to the constitution. The U.S. Constitution does not grant voting rights to non-citizens, regardless of how long they have lived in the country, so constitutionalists would likely disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的，但是只有在此国家生活10年后

This answer suggests a longer waiting period for foreigners before they can vote, but it still goes against the principle of constitutionalism, which emphasizes adherence to the constitution. The U.S. Constitution does not grant voting rights to non-citizens, regardless of how long they have lived in the country, so constitutionalists would likely disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的，但是他们不该被允许为当地选举投票

While this answer suggests a compromise between allowing and restricting voting rights for foreigners, it still goes against the principle of constitutionalism, which emphasizes adherence to the constitution. The U.S. Constitution does not grant voting rights to non-citizens, so constitutionalists would likely disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的，但是他们应该只被允许在当地选举中投票

This answer suggests allowing foreigners to vote in local elections, but it still goes against the principle of constitutionalism, which emphasizes adherence to the constitution. The U.S. Constitution does not grant voting rights to non-citizens, even in local elections, so constitutionalists would likely disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

Constitutionalism emphasizes the importance of adhering to the constitution and its principles. The U.S. Constitution does not grant voting rights to non-citizens. Historically, voting rights have been limited to citizens, with some exceptions for certain groups of people, such as Native Americans and African Americans, who were eventually granted citizenship and voting rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的，但是只有在他们是欧盟公民的情况下

This answer suggests granting voting rights based on a specific nationality or regional affiliation, which goes against the principle of constitutionalism, which emphasizes adherence to the constitution. The U.S. Constitution does not grant voting rights based on nationality or regional affiliation, so constitutionalists would likely strongly disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.