70%
Yes
30%
No
57%
Yes
24%
No
9%
Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute
5%
No, fund national and local programs instead
3%
Yes, but decrease the amount
1%
No, it has shown to be ineffective
0%
Yes, and increase the amount

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “World Health Organization” has changed over time for 6.6k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “World Health Organization” has changed over time for 6.6k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Australia users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @992LLJKanswered…1yr1Y

Yes, in theory but national and local healthcare needs funding more.

 @982VQ9Manswered…1yr1Y

 @97ZHCMGanswered…1yr1Y

To maintain good worldly relations I believe a portion of our funding should help poorer countries in an emergency crisis but our main focus is to clean up our own back yards first.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “World Health Organization” news articles, updated frequently.

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to Australia voters.