Private prisons are incarceration centers that are run by a for-profit company instead of a government agency. The companies that operate private prisons are paid a per-diem or monthly rate for each prisoner they keep in their facilities. In 2018 18.4% of prisoners in Australia were held in private prisons. Opponents of private prisons argue that incarceration is a social responsibility and that entrusting it to for-profit companies is inhumane. Proponents argue that prisons run by private companies are consistently more cost effective than those run by government agencies.
22% Yes |
78% No |
15% Yes |
74% No |
6% Yes, but they should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption |
5% No, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
0% Yes, but eliminate contractual occupancy quotas |
See how support for each position on “Private Prisons” has changed over time for 165k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Private Prisons” has changed over time for 165k Australia voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Australia users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9D22T5T9mos9MO
It does matter whether there are privet services or not
@9CKHXCB10mos10MO
Don’t supervise prisons lock the door shovel food in and leave them to their own devises it’s meant to be a deterrent after all.
@99GYFMH1yr1Y
No, private prisons should be seperate from the government
@92SCPP92yrs2Y
Yes, but there funding should be inversly proportional to the reoffending rate of prisoners
@92FH5DL2yrs2Y
Possibly depending on the situation
Explore other topics that are important to Australia voters.
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
The two-state solution is a proposed diplomatic solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The proposal envisions an independent State of Palestine that borders Israel. Palestinian leadership has supported the concept since the 1982 Arab Summit in Fez. In 2017 the Hamas (a Palestinian Resistance…
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry.…