40%
Yes
60%
No
16%
Yes
57%
No
17%
Yes, but only by court order
3%
No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications
4%
Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism
3%
Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “Government Surveillance” has changed over time for 85.8k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “Government Surveillance” has changed over time for 85.8k Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Australia users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @9GGG49Zanswered…6mos6MO

Yes, but only to the extent that the individual expresses fanatical tendencies. Terrorism is it often used as excuse to increase surveillance.

 @9CH93R9answered…10mos10MO

It depends on the circumstances and being allowed to do this could lead to issues if the government has ill intentions. However, the reasoning behind it is decent enough and therefore it is understandable as to why they wish to monitor phone calls and emails however it could be abused easily. So tl;dr, its a 'yes'.

 @93423QJanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but only with sound intelligence of a current threat or attack in order to achieve actionable prevention

Other Popular Questions

Explore other topics that are important to Australia voters.