@ISIDEWITHpytaniaZagadnienia mieszkaniowe3 lata temu

Czy osoby bezdomne, które odmówiły dostępnego schronienia lub mieszkania, powinny mieć możliwość spania lub biwakowania na terenie publicznym?

+
Powiększ
+ Ustawienia x  

Przełącz bazę wyborców

Statystyki są wyświetlane dla tej grupy demograficznej

Przegląd Odpowiedzi

Wskaźniki odpowiedzi 230 Logan (C) wyborców.

49%
Tak
51%
Nie
36%
Tak
50%
Nie
13%
Tak, i stwórz więcej programów społecznościowych, aby zapewnić bezpłatną żywność, odzież i lekarstwa
1%
Nie i uczyń z tego przestępstwo

Wsparcie Historyczne

Trend poparcia na przestrzeni czasu dla każdej odpowiedzi udzielonej przez 230 Logan (C) wyborców.

Chart
Line chart with 6 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying values. Range: to .
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Ładowanie wykresu... 

Znaczenie Historyczne

Trend pokazujący, jak ważna jest ta kwestia dla 230 Logan (C) wyborców.

Chart
Line chart with 7 lines.
The chart has 1 X axis displaying values. Range: to .
The chart has 2 Y axes displaying values and values.
End of interactive chart.

Ładowanie wykresu... 

Inne Popularne Odpowiedzi

Niezwykłe odpowiedzi Logan (C) wyborców, których poglądy wykraczały poza podane opcje.

Najnowsze Wiadomości

Bądź na bieżąco z najnowszymi artykułami dotyczącymi „Obozy bezdomnych” , często aktualizowanymi.

 @ISIDEWITH przesłano…6mos6MO

Kryzys narkotykowy skłania Portland do ponownego uruchomienia rządu miasta

In a sign of either hope or desperation, Portland voters decided to throw out their entire government structure and replace it with a weaker mayor, expanded City Council and ranked choice voting.A major driving factor was the passage of “Measure 110” decriminalizing all drugs in 2020, which was backed by 74 percent of Multnomah County’s residents. Voters couldn’t — or at least didn’t — anticipate how this policy change would reshape a city already strapped for money, dealing with a public health crisis and confronting rising rates of homelessness and fentanyl abuse.Drug use shot up, homelessness worsened and taxpayers fled.“Political rhetoric in 2020-2021 in the City of Portland was incredibly ideologically driven,” Gonzalez said, explaining that there was a “default conversation” on topics like homelessness or police reform that shut down an exchange of ideas.The City Council race, meanwhile, is mayhem. Portland is switching from four at-large seats to twelve seats representing four districts. The dozens of candidates include Black Lives Matter leaders, nonprofit advocates, business owners and police officers.There are 19 people running for mayor and 98 people seeking seats on the City Council. They’re nearly all campaigning on left-of-center platforms — this is Portland.Pandemic closures, protests, elevated crime rates and rising homelessness buffeted many liberal cities in recent years, including San Francisco and Minneapolis. But policy choices made by the city and state aggravated their impact in Portland.The ramifications are measurable: Nearly 12,000 people moved out of Multnomah County between 2020 and 2023, per data from Portland State University. The exodus between 2020 and 2021 alone took nearly $1.1 billion in taxable income out of the city, according to data analyzed by the Economic Innovation Group. Portland’s once bustling downtown is nearly empty, and a negative national reputation clouds its economic future.Drug decriminalization and the city’s open camping rules compounded the feeling of insecurity. Homeless encampments spread through empty public spaces and filled sidewalks during the lockdown, and some became epicenters for the fentanyl trade. Even Portlanders who voted for decriminalization and believe in a compassionate approach to homelessness didn’t feel as safe in their own neighborhoods.