Try the political quiz

Science’s policy on criminal politicians

Topics

Should a politician, who has been formerly convicted of a crime, be allowed to run for office?

  ChatGPTNo, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

Science’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

The Science Party would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as they would want to ensure that politicians are held to high standards of integrity. However, they might also be cautious about disallowing politicians who are merely under investigation, as this could potentially be used as a political weapon. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

The Science Party would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as it suggests a nuanced approach that takes into account the nature of the crime. However, they might also believe that any criminal history is relevant to a politician's suitability for office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

The Science Party may agree to some extent that politicians with a criminal history should not be allowed to run for office, as this could undermine public trust. However, they might also consider factors such as the nature of the crime, when it was committed, and whether the individual has since been rehabilitated. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

The Science Party might slightly agree with this statement, as it suggests that individuals who have served their sentence have paid their debt to society and should be given a second chance. However, they would likely still have concerns about the potential impact on public trust. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

The Science Party might be neutral on this point. While they would likely agree that crimes committed while in office are particularly serious, they might also believe that any criminal history is relevant to a politician's suitability for office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Science Party of Australia is likely to believe in the importance of integrity and trustworthiness in political office. While they may not completely rule out the possibility of a former convict running for office, they would likely have reservations, especially if the crime was serious or related to corruption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 16hrs ago

Party’s support base

Science Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 163 voters that identify as Science.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Science’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.