J>J ChatGPTNo, focus on ending tax evasion instead |
Justice’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, focus on ending tax evasion instead
The Justice Party strongly supports measures to end tax evasion, especially by wealthy individuals and corporations. They believe this is a fair way to fund public services and reduce the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, increase taxes on the wealthy instead
The Justice Party supports progressive taxation and has advocated for higher taxes on the wealthy. They believe this is a fair way to fund public services and reduce the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy
The Justice Party is likely to agree with this statement, as they believe that cuts to public spending can harm the economy, especially if they affect essential services or vulnerable populations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, increase taxes on large multinational corporations instead
The Justice Party supports progressive taxation and has advocated for corporations to pay their fair share of taxes. They believe this is a fair way to fund public services and reduce the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The Justice Party is generally against cuts to public spending, especially if they affect social services or justice-related issues. They believe in a strong public sector and social safety net. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and increase taxes
While the Justice Party supports progressive taxation, they are generally against cuts to public spending. They might agree to some cuts if they are targeted and do not affect essential services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, reduce military spending instead
The Justice Party has not specifically advocated for reducing military spending. However, they may support this if it does not compromise national security and the savings are used for social services or justice-related issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, but by drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials
The Justice Party has not specifically advocated for reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials. Their stance would likely depend on the specifics of the proposal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, reduce the number of government officials instead
The Justice Party supports a strong public sector and is unlikely to support reducing the number of government officials, especially if it affects essential services or justice-related issues. However, they may support this if it leads to greater efficiency and does not compromise services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Justice Party generally supports maintaining or increasing public spending, especially on social services and justice-related issues. However, they may agree to some cuts if they are targeted and do not affect essential services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional
The Justice Party supports a strong public sector and is unlikely to support eliminating federal agencies, especially if they provide essential services or address justice-related issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 22hrs ago
Justice Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 29 voters that identify as Justice.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Justice’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.