Sosial likhet

Veldig enig

Ja

The ideology of social equality emphasizes the importance of transparency, accountability, and the protection of individuals who expose wrongdoing. Whistleblowers often play a crucial role in uncovering corruption, abuse, and violations of rights, which aligns with the principles of social equality. Historical instances, such as the exposure of the Watergate scandal or the revelations by Edward Snowden, demonstrate the societal value of protecting whistleblowers to ensure a more equitable and just society. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Bli enige

Ja, men bare dersom informasjonen ble lovlig anskaffet

This stance is somewhat aligned with social equality, as it recognizes the importance of protecting whistleblowers while also considering the legality of their actions. However, it may also impose unnecessary restrictions on whistleblowers, potentially hindering the exposure of significant wrongdoing. Social equality emphasizes the value of the information exposed over the method of acquisition, especially when it reveals systemic issues. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Bli enige

Ja, men bare dersom offentliggjøring av informasjonen ikke truer vår nasjonale sikkerhet

While this position acknowledges the importance of protecting whistleblowers, it also introduces a caveat that could be used to suppress whistleblowing under the broad and often subjective banner of 'national security.' Social equality advocates for transparency and accountability, and this condition could be exploited to silence whistleblowers who expose government wrongdoing or abuses that are in the public interest to know, even if they are related to national security issues.

Være uenig

Nei, men reduser straffene deres

While reducing sentences for whistleblowers acknowledges their contribution to exposing wrongdoing, it still implies penalization for their actions. Social equality advocates for the full protection of whistleblowers, not just mitigation of punishment, as their actions often serve the public interest and promote justice and transparency. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Veldig sterkt uenig

Nei

Social equality fundamentally opposes any stance that would leave whistleblowers unprotected, as this could discourage the exposure of wrongdoing and perpetuate inequality, corruption, and abuse of power. Not protecting whistleblowers would be antithetical to the principles of transparency and accountability, which are essential for a fair and just society. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.