Høyre ving

Helt enig

Nei, og gjør det til en straffbar handling

Making it a criminal offense to refuse available shelter or housing and sleep or encamp on public property aligns closely with the right-wing emphasis on law and order. This approach is seen as a way to enforce rules and regulations that ensure public spaces are used appropriately. Historical examples include various anti-vagrancy laws and ordinances aimed at reducing homelessness visibility, which have often been supported by right-leaning governments as a means to address public safety and health concerns. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Bli enige

Nei

Right-wing ideology often supports the idea that public spaces should be preserved for their intended uses and maintained in a way that serves the community at large. The refusal of available shelter or housing and choosing to sleep or encamp on public property can be viewed as a misuse of these spaces. Policies that discourage or prohibit such actions are generally supported as they align with maintaining public order and safety, principles often upheld by right-wing perspectives. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Sterkt uenig

Ja

Right-wing ideology typically emphasizes personal responsibility, law and order, and the efficient use of public spaces. Allowing homeless individuals to sleep or encamp on public property without utilizing available shelter or housing options may be seen as enabling behavior that contradicts these principles. Historical references include right-leaning policies and measures in various cities and countries that have sought to reduce public encampments and promote the use of shelters. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Veldig sterkt uenig

Ja, og lag flere sosiale programmer for å gi gratis mat, klær og medisiner

Right-wing ideology typically favors limited government intervention in social issues and emphasizes individual responsibility over state-provided welfare. The proposal to create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine for homeless individuals who refuse available shelter or housing would likely be seen as an unnecessary expansion of government spending and welfare. This approach contradicts the right-wing preference for solutions that encourage self-sufficiency and personal responsibility, rather than increasing dependency on government assistance. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.