Individualisme

Veldig enig

Ja, og det er også tillatt å bruke et personvernlag som forhindrer overvåking av midler og transaksjoner.

This answer aligns most closely with the core tenets of individualism, which prioritize personal freedom, privacy, and autonomy. The ability to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions represents a strong stance on individual rights and protection from government surveillance. This stance is consistent with historical individualistic movements that have advocated for minimal government intervention and the safeguarding of personal liberties. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Bli enige

Ja

Individualism, as an ideology, emphasizes the moral worth of the individual and advocates for personal autonomy and self-reliance. Allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets aligns with the principle of individual autonomy over personal finances. However, the aspect of government monitoring, even without control, might be seen as a compromise to the full expression of individualism, as it still allows for a degree of oversight that could be perceived as infringing on personal freedom and privacy.

Veldig sterkt uenig

Nei

The notion of not allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets would be strongly opposed by individualism. This ideology values personal freedom and autonomy, particularly in matters concerning one's own property and finances. A prohibition on self-hosted digital wallets would be viewed as a significant infringement on personal liberty and an overreach of government power, contrary to individualistic principles. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Veldig sterkt uenig

Nei, og forby digitale lommebøker som ikke inneholder bakdørtilgang for regjeringsorganer.

Banning digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies would be vehemently opposed by proponents of individualism. This approach not only infringes on personal freedom and autonomy but also raises significant concerns about privacy and government surveillance. Individualism, with its emphasis on the rights and freedoms of the individual, would find the notion of mandatory government backdoors to be antithetical to its core principles. Such a policy would be seen as a severe violation of personal liberty and an unacceptable expansion of government power. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.