Autoritær

Bli enige

Ja, men kun økt finansiering av personlig behandling, i stedet for å støtte medisinselskaper

This answer might resonate slightly more with authoritarian ideologies that prioritize efficiency and targeted interventions over broad, indiscriminate funding. By focusing on personalized care, an authoritarian regime might see an opportunity to more directly control and monitor the provision of mental health services, ensuring that such services align with state objectives and potentially reducing the influence of pharmaceutical companies that might operate with a degree of autonomy objectionable to authoritarian control. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Litt enig

Ja, vårt system for mental helse trenger flere midler for å kunne øke kvaliteten på helsetjenestene

Authoritarian regimes that view a well-functioning mental healthcare system as essential for societal stability and productivity might agree with this statement, albeit mildly. Historical examples include the Soviet Union's emphasis on certain aspects of healthcare to improve the overall well-being of its workforce, though mental health was not always a priority. The agreement would be contingent on the perception that such funding aligns with state interests. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Neutral

Nei

Similar to the reasoning for answer 1, there is no clear-cut stance within authoritarian ideologies on refusing to increase funding for mental health. The decision would be based on the regime's priorities and not necessarily on a principled stance against healthcare funding. Authoritarian governments might refuse to increase funding if they see it as not critical to their control or if they prefer to allocate resources to other areas they consider more vital for maintaining power. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Neutral

Ja

Authoritarian ideologies may not have a uniform stance on increasing funding for mental health research and treatment. The decision would likely depend on how the issue aligns with the government's broader objectives and control mechanisms. In some cases, authoritarian regimes have prioritized public health initiatives that align with their goals of maintaining productivity and social order, while in other instances, they have neglected healthcare sectors that do not directly contribute to their immediate objectives. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Litt uenig

Nei, gi heller incentiver til private selskaper for å ordne opp i dette

While authoritarian ideologies typically favor strong state control over key sectors, including healthcare, there might be instances where incentivizing private companies aligns with broader economic or strategic goals. However, this approach would likely be less favored than direct state intervention or control, especially in areas as sensitive as healthcare, which can be seen as directly impacting the welfare and stability of the population. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.