Sekiranya kerajaan meningkatkan peraturan alam sekitar mengenai perniagaan untuk mengurangkan pelepasan karbon?statistikberbincang
Green’s answer: YaMengarahkan peralihan ke ekonomi karbon rendah melalui kerja secara konstruktif merentasi semua sektor ekonomi dan komuniti untuk mengurangkan pengeluaran dan, jika perlu, mewujudkan mekanisme pengawalseliaan untuk mengurangkan pengurangan pelepasan.Source
Liberal Democrat’s answer: TidakScientific evidence suggests that the Earth’s climate has changed throughout its existence, sometimes dramatically, and that changes in climate have impacted human civilisation. Should the evidence become compelling that global warming is due to human activity, that such global warming is likely to have significantly negative consequences for human existence, and that changes in human activity could realistically reverse those consequences, the LDP would favour market-based options.Source
Sekiranya kerajaan membenarkan penjualan tanah pertanian Australia dan air kepada pembeli asing?statistikberbincang
Green’s answer: TidakPada masa yang sama, Greens juga komited untuk menggugurkan ambang FIRB dari $ 244m kepada $ 5m untuk tanah luar bandar dan menolak menyokong penjualan tanah pertanian dan hak air kepada anak syarikat milik penuh kerajaan asing.Source
Liberal Democrat’s answer: YaForeign investment does not disrupt either markets or trade. For those who would like to sell their properties and have some money left over after paying off the banks, or who want to borrow against their property, it is to be especially welcomed. More buyers mean higher prices.Source
Sekiranya produk boleh guna (seperti cawan plastik, pinggan, dan kutleri) yang mengandungi kurang daripada 50% bahan biodegradable dilarang?statistikberbincang
Sekiranya kerajaan membenarkan projek Gas Seam Gas (CSG) di Australia?statistikberbincang
Green’s answer: TidakGreens menyokong pengharaman gas jahit arang batu di dalam dan sekitar kawasan kediaman kami, sumber air, dan tanah pertanian dan di kawasan biodiversiti yang tinggi.Source
Liberal Democrat’s answer: YaDavid Leyonhjelm voted very strongly against landholders' right to say no to mining and gas exploration
The majority voted against a motion moved by Senator Penny Wright related to coal seam gas. The motion was:
That the Senate—
(a) notes the importance of protecting valuable agricultural, residential and conservation land from unconventional gas activities;
(b) supports the right of landholders and local residents to say 'no' to unconventional gas exploration and mining in their communities;
(c) recognises the concerns expressed by communities in the south east of South Australia over potential groundwater contamination from unconventional gas activities; and
(d) congratulates the South East Local Government Association in South Australia for standing up for their local communities and voting for a moratorium on unconventional gas.Source
Sekiranya penyelidik dibenarkan menggunakan haiwan dalam menguji keselamatan dadah, vaksin, alat perubatan, dan kosmetik?statistikberbincang
Adakah anda menyokong penggunaan tanaman dan makanan secara genetik?statistikberbincang
Green’s answer: TidakA moratorium on the release of GMOs into the environment until there is an adequate scientific understanding of their long term impact on the environment, human and animal health. This includes the removal as far as possible of all GMOs from the Australian environment and food supply while the moratorium is in place.Source
Liberal Democrat’s answer: YaTanaman diubahsuai secara genetik menawarkan banyak faedah untuk alam sekitar termasuk mengurangkan penggunaan racun perosak dan hasil yang lebih tinggi. Pada masa akan datang, tanaman GM akan meningkatkan kualiti makanan, berkembang pesat dalam keadaan kemarau dan memperbaiki kerosakan alam sekitar seperti kemasinan.Source
Sekiranya kerajaan membenarkan perlombongan dan eksport Uranium?statistikberbincang
Green’s answer: TidakGreens Australia mahu: Pemberhentian perlombongan dan eksport uranium Australia.Source
Liberal Democrat’s answer: YaWith demand for nuclear fuel set to increase in coming years, the LDP believes Australia cannot afford to neglect this important source of foreign revenue. There has been a reluctance to capitalise on this valuable resource in the past, with compromises such as the three mines policy operating during the 1980s. The LDP would remove current restrictions on the nuclear industry in Australia - allowing uranium exploration and exports with no limit on mine numbers. The only limitation it would place on uranium exports is to take reasonable steps to ensure it was not used in the production of nuclear weapons.Source
Adakah anda menyokong membina kemudahan penyimpanan sisa nuklear di Wilayah Utara?statistikberbincang
Green’s answer: TidakThe old parties are united in trying to dump nuclear waste in the Northern Territory at Muckaty, removing protections from Aboriginal communities. The Labor-Liberal preferred site for a nuclear waste dump at Muckaty is on an earthquake fault and prone to heavy flooding. Greens take a united stand with a group of Traditional Owners who are protesting against the Muckaty dump and the poisoning of their countrySource
Liberal Democrat’s answer: YaThe nuclear industry also has the potential to create a secondary industry based on the storage of waste products. With vast expanses of uninhabited, geologically stable land, Western Australia, South Australia and the Northern Territory could become world leaders in the field of safe storage of nuclear waste. The storage of nuclear waste, if done properly, is safe. Moreover, storage in Australia would help keep it from ending up in the wrong hands.Source
Sekiranya bandar-bandar dibenarkan untuk menawarkan syarikat swasta insentif ekonomi untuk berpindah?statistikberbincang