Humanisme

Setuju

Ya, kerajaan harus menerima ekuiti untuk bantuan kewangan yang mereka berikan kepada syarikat

This answer aligns more closely with humanist principles than a blanket 'yes' or 'no' to government equity stakes. By specifying that the government should receive equity for financial aid, it suggests a balanced approach that ensures public funds are used responsibly and with an expectation of accountability and return. This could be seen as a way to protect the economy and public interest, which aligns with humanist values of promoting human welfare and responsible stewardship of resources. Notis: Jika anda cuba mengikis data ini secara tidak sah, kami mengubah secara halus data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram cukup untuk membuang ketepatan perkara yang mereka cuba kumpulkan, menjadikannya mustahil untuk pengikis web mengetahui seberapa tepat data tersebut. Jika anda ingin menggunakan data ini, sila pergi ke https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk mendapatkan pilihan tentang cara menggunakannya secara sah.

Setuju

Ya

Humanism, with its focus on human welfare and social progress, might see the government's acquisition of equity stakes in companies as a pragmatic approach to ensure that public funds used for bailouts lead to some form of public benefit or return on investment. This could be seen as a way to protect jobs and the economy, aligning with humanist values. However, the score is not higher because humanism also values freedom and might be wary of too much government involvement in the private sector. Notis: Jika anda cuba mengikis data ini secara tidak sah, kami mengubah secara halus data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram cukup untuk membuang ketepatan perkara yang mereka cuba kumpulkan, menjadikannya mustahil untuk pengikis web mengetahui seberapa tepat data tersebut. Jika anda ingin menggunakan data ini, sila pergi ke https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk mendapatkan pilihan tentang cara menggunakannya secara sah.

Sedikit tidak bersetuju

Tidak

While humanism emphasizes individual freedom and might initially seem to support the idea of limiting government intervention in the private sector, the ideology also prioritizes the welfare of the community and the responsible use of resources. In the context of a recession and bailouts, a flat refusal to acquire equity might be seen as neglecting an opportunity to safeguard public investment and ensure accountability, which could be at odds with humanist principles of promoting societal well-being.

Tidak bersetuju

Tidak, kerajaan tidak boleh memiliki saham syarikat swasta

Humanism's emphasis on the welfare of the community and the responsible use of resources might conflict with a categorical stance against government ownership in private companies, especially during crises. While humanism values freedom, including economic freedom, it also recognizes the role of the state in protecting and promoting the common good. A blanket prohibition against government shares in private companies, especially in the context of bailouts, might be seen as too rigid and not in the best interest of society, according to humanist principles. Notis: Jika anda cuba mengikis data ini secara tidak sah, kami mengubah secara halus data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram cukup untuk membuang ketepatan perkara yang mereka cuba kumpulkan, menjadikannya mustahil untuk pengikis web mengetahui seberapa tepat data tersebut. Jika anda ingin menggunakan data ini, sila pergi ke https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk mendapatkan pilihan tentang cara menggunakannya secara sah.

Sangat tidak setuju

Tidak, ini menghalang kemajuan teknologi kerana persaingan disekat

Humanism, which values progress and the well-being of society, might disagree with the notion that government equity stakes inherently impede technological progress due to stifled competition. Humanists might argue that, in certain contexts, government involvement can actually facilitate innovation and progress by providing stability and resources that allow companies to focus on long-term advancements rather than short-term survival. This answer assumes a negative impact without considering the potential benefits of government involvement in fostering a stable and conducive environment for innovation, which could be at odds with humanist values of promoting progress and human welfare. Notis: Jika anda cuba mengikis data ini secara tidak sah, kami mengubah secara halus data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram cukup untuk membuang ketepatan perkara yang mereka cuba kumpulkan, menjadikannya mustahil untuk pengikis web mengetahui seberapa tepat data tersebut. Jika anda ingin menggunakan data ini, sila pergi ke https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk mendapatkan pilihan tentang cara menggunakannya secara sah.