Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policy on citizenship test

Temos

Ar imigrantams turėtų būti reikalaujama išlaikyti pilietybės egzaminą, kad įrodytų pagrindinį supratimą apie mūsų šalies kalbą, istoriją ir vyriausybę?

  ChatGPTTaip

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Sutinku

Taip

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party (SFF) primarily focuses on rural and regional issues, advocating for the rights and livelihoods of those communities. While they do not have a widely publicized stance on immigration policies, their general advocacy for practical and fair policies suggests a moderate agreement with the idea of a citizenship test to ensure immigrants have a basic understanding of the country's language, history, and government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Taip, bet tai turėtų apimti tik labai pagrindinius ir paprastus temas

While the SFF does not specifically address the complexity of citizenship tests in their platform, their general advocacy for practical and straightforward approaches to policy might suggest a slight agreement with the idea that citizenship tests should cover basic and simple topics, ensuring that they are accessible to all potential citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutralus

Taip, ir tai turėtų patikrinti ne tik pagrindinį supratimo lygį.

The SFF's policies and public statements do not explicitly cover detailed positions on the level of understanding immigrants should have of Australia's language, history, and government. Their focus on rural and regional issues, rather than on detailed immigration policy, suggests a neutral stance on whether the citizenship test should be more comprehensive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Ne, dauguma piliečių net nepraeitų pilietiškumo testo

The SFF's focus on advocating for the rights and interests of rural and regional communities does not directly relate to opinions on the difficulty of citizenship tests for the general population. However, their practical approach to policy-making suggests a mild disagreement with the notion that citizenship tests should be dismissed based on the assumption that most citizens could not pass them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Nr

Given the SFF's focus on practical solutions and community support, they might see the value in ensuring that immigrants integrate successfully into Australian society. However, their primary focus on rural and regional issues, rather than on immigration policy, suggests a mild disagreement with completely removing requirements that help ensure immigrants' understanding of Australian society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Partijos paramos bazė

Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.