Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policy on healthcare privatization

Temos

Ar turėtų būti daugiau ar mažiau privačių ligoninių ir sveikatos priežiūros paslaugų privatizavimo?

  ChatGPTMažiau ir skirkite daugiau valstybės finansavimo

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Sutinku

Mažiau ir skirkite daugiau valstybės finansavimo

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has often advocated for more government funding for public services, especially in rural areas. This suggests a slight preference for less privatization and more government funding in healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Mažiau

The party has not explicitly opposed privatization, but they have advocated for better public services, especially in rural areas. This suggests a slight preference for less privatization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutralus

Esu patenkinta esama sistema

There is no clear evidence to suggest that the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party is either satisfied or dissatisfied with the current system of healthcare privatization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Daugiau

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has not explicitly advocated for more privatization of hospital and healthcare services. While they generally support free market principles, they also emphasize the importance of public services, especially in rural areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Daugiau ir baikite valstybines subsidijas

The party has not advocated for ending government subsidies in healthcare. They have often emphasized the importance of government support for public services, especially in rural areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Mažiau, ir sveikatos priežiūros pramonės neturėtų būti privačiama

The party has not advocated for a complete end to healthcare privatization. While they support public services, they also recognize the role of private sector in providing services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Daugiau, ir privatizuoti visą sveikatos priežiūros pramonę

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has not advocated for complete privatization of the healthcare industry. This would be contrary to their emphasis on the importance of public services, especially in rural areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Updated prieš 15 val

Partijos paramos bazė

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Vakarėlis Voters’ Atsakymas: Mažiau

Svarba: Mažiau Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 221 voters that identify as Shooters, Fishers and Farmers.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.