Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policy on animal testing

Temos

Ar turėtų būti leidžiama tyrėjams naudoti gyvūnus testuojant vaistų, vakcinų, medicininių prietaisų ir kosmetikos saugumą?

  ChatGPTTaip, bet ne kosmetikai

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Sutinku

Taip, bet ne kosmetikai

While the SFF party has not made explicit statements about animal testing, it is plausible that they would support a more moderate position that allows for animal testing in medical research but not for cosmetics. This is based on the assumption that they may differentiate between the use of animals for essential human health benefits versus non-essential purposes like cosmetics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party (SFF) has not made explicit statements about animal testing for medical purposes. However, given their general support for hunting and fishing activities, it can be inferred that they may not be strongly opposed to the use of animals in research for the advancement of human health. Their score is not higher because of the lack of explicit policy or statement on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Nr

The SFF party has not shown a strong stance against the use of animals in contexts that benefit humans, such as hunting and fishing. Therefore, it is unlikely that they would strongly support a complete ban on animal testing, especially when it comes to testing drugs, vaccines, and medical devices that could potentially save human lives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Updated prieš 16 val

Partijos paramos bazė

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Vakarėlis Voters’ Atsakymas: Taip

Svarba: Mažiausiai Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 71 voters that identify as Shooters, Fishers and Farmers.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.