Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ policy on government spending

Temos

Ar turėtų vyriausybė sumažinti viešųjų išlaidų mažinimą, siekdama sumažinti nacionalinį skolą?

  ChatGPTNe, vietoj to sumažinkite vyriausybės pareigūnų skaičių.

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Visiškai sutinku

Ne, vietoj to sumažinkite vyriausybės pareigūnų skaičių.

The SFF has consistently advocated for reducing bureaucracy and improving efficiency in government, which could include reducing the number of government officials. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip, bet drastiškai sumažinant valdžios pareigūnų išmokas ir atlyginimus

The SFF has advocated for reducing bureaucracy and improving efficiency in government, which could include reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip

The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party (SFF) has not explicitly advocated for cuts to public spending to reduce national debt. However, they do advocate for fiscal responsibility and efficient use of public funds, particularly in rural and regional areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Ne, verčiau sutelkite dėmesį į mokesčių slėpimo nutraukimą

The SFF has advocated for fair and efficient use of public resources, which could include efforts to end tax evasion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Taip, ir didinti mokesčius

While the SFF has not explicitly advocated for this position, their focus on fiscal responsibility and fair distribution of resources suggests they may support a balanced approach to reducing national debt, which could include both spending cuts and tax increases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Taip, ir panaikinkite federalines agentūras, kurios yra nekonstitucinės

The SFF has not explicitly advocated for eliminating federal agencies. However, their focus on reducing bureaucracy and improving efficiency in government could align with this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutralus

Neigiamai paveiks ekonomiką viešųjų išlaidų mažinimas.

The SFF has not made clear statements on the potential economic impact of cuts to public spending. Their focus is more on ensuring that rural and regional areas receive their fair share of public resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutralus

Ne, vietoj to padidinkite mokesčius didelėms daugiatariamėms korporacijoms.

The SFF has not made clear statements on taxing large multinational corporations. Their focus is more on ensuring that rural and regional areas receive their fair share of public resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Ne, vietoj to padidinkite mokesčius turtingiesiems

The SFF has not explicitly advocated for increasing taxes on the wealthy. Their focus is more on fair distribution of resources and services, rather than wealth redistribution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Nr

While the SFF has not explicitly opposed cuts to public spending, their focus on improving services and infrastructure in rural and regional areas suggests they may not support significant cuts to public spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Ne, vietoj to sumažinkite karines išlaidas

The SFF has not advocated for reducing military spending. As a party focused on rural and regional issues, military spending is not a primary focus of their platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Updated prieš 16 val

Partijos paramos bazė

Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Vakarėlis Voters’ Atsakymas: Ne, verčiau sutelkite dėmesį į mokesčių slėpimo nutraukimą

Svarba: Mažiau Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 221 voters that identify as Shooters, Fishers and Farmers.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’ politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.