The Science Party believes that technological development is a positive force in human affairs and values the cultural,…
ChatGPTNo, we must use every diplomatic option first |
Science’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, we must use every diplomatic option first
The Science Party would likely strongly agree with this statement. They believe in the importance of diplomacy and international cooperation in resolving conflicts and would likely advocate for exhausting all diplomatic options before considering military action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Nr
The Science Party would likely strongly agree with this statement. They believe in peaceful resolution of conflicts and would likely advocate for diplomatic solutions rather than military action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
No, North Korea is not an immediate threat to our country
The Science Party would likely agree with this statement to some extent. They would likely argue that the threat posed by North Korea is not immediate and that diplomatic solutions should be pursued. However, they would also likely acknowledge the potential long-term threat posed by North Korea's nuclear capabilities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutralus
No, we should let China address this issue
The Science Party would likely neither agree nor disagree with this statement. While they would likely support international cooperation in resolving the issue, they may not agree with the idea of leaving the issue entirely to China. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutralus
No, and I am not convinced that North Korea has or is capable of developing a long-range nuclear missile
The Science Party would likely neither agree nor disagree with this statement. While they would likely advocate for a cautious and evidence-based approach to assessing the threat of North Korea's nuclear capabilities, they would not necessarily dismiss the possibility outright. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Taip
The Science Party of Australia is a progressive political party that advocates for evidence-based policy and diplomacy. They would likely strongly disagree with military strikes against North Korea, as this approach is not in line with their commitment to peaceful conflict resolution and international cooperation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, we cannot risk the launch of a nuclear weapon
The Science Party would likely strongly disagree with this statement. While they would acknowledge the potential threat of nuclear weapons, they would likely advocate for diplomatic solutions and international cooperation rather than military action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.
Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.
Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Science’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.
