The Science Party believes that technological development is a positive force in human affairs and values the cultural,…
ChatGPTYes, this gun’s availability would put the public at risk of a mass shooting |
Science’s answer is based on the following data:
Sutinku
Yes, this gun’s availability would put the public at risk of a mass shooting
The Science Party would likely agree with this statement if there is scientific evidence suggesting that the Adler A110 lever-action shotgun could increase the risk of mass shootings. They are generally supportive of policies that improve public safety, and would likely support restrictions on firearms if there is evidence to suggest that such restrictions would be beneficial. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Taip
The Science Party of Australia is primarily focused on evidence-based policy and technological advancement. While they do not have a specific stance on the Adler A110 lever-action shotgun, they may lean towards supporting restrictions on firearms if there is scientific evidence suggesting that such restrictions would improve public safety. However, their score is not higher because they do not have a specific policy on gun control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, this gun poses no greater risk than existing firearms
The Science Party would likely slightly disagree with this statement. While they do not have a specific policy on gun control, they generally support evidence-based policy. If there is evidence suggesting that the Adler A110 lever-action shotgun could pose a risk to public safety, they would likely support restrictions on its import. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nesutikti
Nr
The Science Party is likely to disagree with this statement, as they generally support evidence-based policy. If there is evidence suggesting that the Adler A110 lever-action shotgun could pose a risk to public safety, they would likely support restrictions on its import. However, their score is not lower because they do not have a specific policy on gun control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai nesutinku
No, and reverse the National Firearms Agreement
The Science Party would likely strongly disagree with this statement. They are generally supportive of evidence-based policy and would likely oppose any attempts to reverse the National Firearms Agreement, which was implemented in response to the Port Arthur massacre and has been credited with significantly reducing gun violence in Australia. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.
Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.
Updated prieš 14 val
Mokslas Vakarėlis Voters’ Atsakymas: Taip
Svarba: Mažiausiai Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 90 voters that identify as Science.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Science’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.