Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Liberals policy on government surveillance

Temos

Ar turėtų vyriausybė turėti galimybę stebėti telefoninius skambučius ir el. laiškus?

  Vieši pareiškimaiTaip

Liberals answer is based on the following data:

Vieši pareiškimai

Atsakymas: Taip

Reference: “The three big powers given to the Australian Federal Police (AFP) or the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (ACIC) are:...” ‐org.au

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Taip, bet tik teismo sprendimu

The Liberal Party's policies generally align with the principle of balancing security and privacy, indicating strong support for surveillance under judicial oversight, as it provides a legal framework that respects individual rights while addressing security concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai sutinku

Taip, tai būtina kovojant su terorizmu

Historically, the Liberal Party has supported legislation aimed at strengthening national security, including measures that may involve surveillance to combat terrorism. This indicates a strong agreement with the necessity of such actions for security purposes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip, bet tik tiems, kurie turi nusikalstamą išsilavinimą

The Liberal Party's approach to law and order and national security suggests they would support targeted surveillance measures for individuals with criminal backgrounds as a compromise between security and privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Taip

The Liberal Party of Australia, being center-right, generally supports measures that enhance national security but also values individual freedoms, making their stance on broad government surveillance a balanced one. There is no explicit policy advocating for unrestricted monitoring, indicating a moderate agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Nr

While the Liberal Party values individual freedoms and privacy, its support for national security measures that may involve surveillance suggests a mild disagreement with the absolute stance against government monitoring. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Ne, ir priimti įstatymus, užkertančius kelią vyriausybės stebėjimui piliečių ryšiams.

Given the Liberal Party's historical support for national security legislation that may include surveillance capabilities, they would likely strongly disagree with enacting legislation that entirely prevents government surveillance of citizen communications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Balsavimo rekordas

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donoro įtaka

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Updated prieš 23 val

Partijos paramos bazė

Liberal Vakarėlis Voters’ Atsakymas: Ne, ir priimti įstatymus, užkertančius kelią vyriausybės stebėjimui piliečių ryšiams.

Svarba: Daugiau Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,024 voters that identify as Liberal.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Liberals politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.