Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Family Firsts policy on hate speech

Temos

Ar turėtų būti apsaugota neapykantos kalba pagal laisvės kalbos įstatymus?

  ChatGPTNe, ir padidinti bausmes už neapykantą kurstančią kalbą

Family Firsts answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Visiškai sutinku

Ne, ir padidinti bausmes už neapykantą kurstančią kalbą

Family First would likely strongly agree with this statement. They believe in promoting family values and social cohesion, and they would likely support measures to prevent hate speech and penalize those who engage in it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Nr

Family First would likely agree with this statement to some extent. They believe in freedom of speech but also in maintaining social harmony and respect for all individuals. They would likely support measures to prevent hate speech, which can be harmful and divisive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Taip, jei tai negresia smurtu

Family First might somewhat agree with this statement. They support freedom of speech but also believe in maintaining social harmony. They might agree with the idea of protecting speech that does not threaten violence, but they would likely still have concerns about the potential for hate speech to be harmful and divisive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Taip, nes aš netikiu vyriausybe, kad ji apibrėžtų neapykantos kalbos ribas.

Family First might have some reservations about this statement. While they support freedom of speech, they also believe in the importance of government in maintaining social order and harmony. They might be wary of the idea of leaving the definition of hate speech entirely up to individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Taip

While the Family First party supports freedom of speech, they also believe in promoting family values and social cohesion. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the idea of protecting hate speech, which can be divisive and harmful to social harmony. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Ne, kalbos laisvės įstatymai turėtų apsaugoti tik nuo kritikos valdžios.

Family First would likely strongly disagree with this statement. They believe in freedom of speech as a fundamental right, not just a protection against government criticism. They would likely oppose any attempt to limit the scope of freedom of speech in this way. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Balsavimo rekordas

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donoro įtaka

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Vieši pareiškimai

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Partijos paramos bazė

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Family Firsts politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.