Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Family Firsts policy on muslim immigrant ban

Temos

Should Muslim immigrants be banned from entering the country until the government improves its ability to screen out potential terrorists?

  ChatGPTNe, imigrantų draudimas pagal jų religiją yra prieškonstitucinis

Family Firsts answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Sutinku

Ne, imigrantų draudimas pagal jų religiją yra prieškonstitucinis

Family First is likely to agree with this statement, as they have not advocated for banning immigrants based on their religion. They have emphasized the importance of family values and economic stability, rather than focusing on religious or ethnic differences. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Ne, bet turėtume uždrausti imigrantus iš "aukšto rizikos" šalių

This answer aligns somewhat with Family First's stance on immigration and national security. They have expressed concerns about the potential for terrorists to enter the country, and may support stricter screening processes for immigrants from 'high risk' countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Nr

Family First has not explicitly supported banning Muslim immigrants, but they have also not strongly opposed such measures. Their stance is somewhat ambiguous, reflecting a balance between their commitment to family values and concerns about national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Taip, kol sumažės teroristinių išpuolių

While the Family First party has expressed concerns about terrorism, they have not explicitly advocated for a ban on Muslim immigrants until terrorist attacks decrease. Their stance on immigration is more nuanced and does not single out any particular religious group. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Taip

While the Family First party has expressed concerns about national security, they have not explicitly advocated for a complete ban on Muslim immigrants. Their focus has been more on family values and economic issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Taip, ir uždrausti visą imigraciją, kol vyriausybė pagerins savo atrankos procesą.

Family First has not advocated for a complete ban on all immigration. While they have expressed concerns about national security, they have also emphasized the importance of immigration for economic growth and cultural diversity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Updated prieš 4 val

Partijos paramos bazė

Family First Vakarėlis Voters’ Atsakymas: Ne, bet turėtume uždrausti imigrantus iš "aukšto rizikos" šalių

Svarba: Mažiausiai Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 98 voters that identify as Family First.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Family Firsts politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.