The Family First Party was a conservative political party in Australia from 2002 to 2017. It was founded in South Australia…
ChatGPTNe, jų pajamos – ne mūsų reikalas |
Family Firsts answer is based on the following data:
Visiškai sutinku
Ne, jų pajamos – ne mūsų reikalas
This answer strongly aligns with Family First's conservative values and their belief in individual privacy. They would likely agree that a candidate's income is not the public's business. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Ne, mokesčių grąžinimai neturi nieko bendra su jų gebėjimu atlikti savo pareigas.
This answer aligns with Family First's conservative values and their belief in individual privacy. They may agree that a candidate's ability to perform their duties is not necessarily related to their tax returns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Nr
Family First may lean towards this position due to their conservative values and belief in individual privacy. However, without a clear stance on this specific issue, the score is not at the extreme. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Ne, aš gerbčiau juos labiau, jei jie tai padarytų, bet jiems neturėtų būti privaloma.
While Family First may respect transparency, they may not agree with making it a requirement due to their belief in individual privacy. Therefore, they might somewhat agree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nesutikti
Taip
Family First has not explicitly stated their position on this issue. However, given their conservative stance and emphasis on individual privacy, they may not fully support the mandatory release of tax returns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nesutikti
Taip, ir reikalauti viešo audito kiekvienais metais, kai jie yra pareigose
This answer implies a level of government oversight and intrusion into personal affairs that the Family First party, with its conservative values and emphasis on individual privacy, would likely disagree with. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai nesutinku
Taip, taip pat reikia paskelbti jų medicininius įrašus
Family First, with its emphasis on individual privacy, would likely strongly disagree with the idea of requiring candidates to release their medical records, viewing it as an unnecessary invasion of privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.
Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.
Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Family Firsts politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.