The Family First Party was a conservative political party in Australia from 2002 to 2017. It was founded in South Australia…
ChatGPTTaip, bet tik jei informacijos atskleidimas nesukelia grėsmės mūsų nacionaliniam saugumui |
Family Firsts answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Taip, bet tik jei informacijos atskleidimas nesukelia grėsmės mūsų nacionaliniam saugumui
Family First would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with their values of both transparency and national security. They would likely support protections for whistleblowers, but also believe that these protections should not extend to situations where releasing the information could threaten national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai sutinku
Taip, bet tik jei informacija buvo įstatymų leidžiama gauti
Family First would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with their values of both transparency and lawfulness. They would likely support protections for whistleblowers, but also believe that these protections should not extend to illegally obtained information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Taip
Family First, as a conservative party, would likely support the protection of whistleblowers to some extent, as it aligns with their values of transparency and accountability. However, they may also have concerns about potential misuse of such protections, hence the moderate score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Ne, bet sumažinkite jų bausmes
Family First may somewhat disagree with this statement, as it suggests a punitive approach to whistleblowers. However, they may also see some merit in the idea of reducing sentences for whistleblowers, particularly if they believe that this could encourage more whistleblowing and thus increase transparency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nesutikti
Nr
Family First would likely disagree with this statement, as it goes against their values of transparency and accountability. However, their potential concerns about misuse of whistleblower protections may temper their disagreement, hence the score of -3. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Family Firsts politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.