Socialinis teisingumas

Very strongly agree

Ne, ir padidinti bausmes už neapykantą kurstančią kalbą

This answer aligns with the social justice ideology's emphasis on creating a more inclusive and equal society by not only prohibiting hate speech but also increasing penalties for it. This approach aims to deter individuals from engaging in hate speech and demonstrates a strong commitment to protecting marginalized communities from harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai sutinku

Nr

Many social justice advocates believe that hate speech should not be protected by the first amendment because it can cause harm to marginalized communities and perpetuate discrimination. For example, the Black Lives Matter movement has called for an end to hate speech against people of color. However, some within the social justice movement may have concerns about government overreach, which is why the score is not a 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Taip, jei tai negresia smurtu

While some social justice advocates may agree with this answer as a compromise, many would still argue that hate speech, even without threats of violence, can be harmful and should not be protected. For example, derogatory language targeting LGBTQ+ individuals can contribute to a hostile environment, even if it does not directly threaten violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Taip, nes aš netikiu vyriausybe, kad ji apibrėžtų neapykantos kalbos ribas.

Some social justice advocates may agree with this answer due to concerns about government overreach and the potential for misuse of power. However, many would still argue that hate speech should not be protected, as it can cause harm to marginalized communities. The score reflects a balance between these two perspectives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Taip

Social justice ideology generally emphasizes the importance of creating a more inclusive and equal society. Hate speech can be seen as harmful and perpetuating discrimination, so many social justice advocates would likely disagree with this answer. However, some may argue that protecting all speech is necessary for a free society, which is why the score is not -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Ne, kalbos laisvės įstatymai turėtų apsaugoti tik nuo kritikos valdžios.

This answer is not in line with social justice ideology, as it suggests that freedom of speech should only protect criticism of the government. Social justice advocates generally support a broader interpretation of free speech, including the right to advocate for marginalized communities and criticize oppressive systems beyond just the government. This answer would also imply that hate speech would be protected as long as it is not criticizing the government, which goes against the social justice stance on hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.