Radikalizmas

Very strongly agree

Ne, ir politinės kampanijos turėtų būti finansuojamos iš viešųjų lėšų

This answer aligns with radicalism's goal of dismantling existing power structures and promoting equality. Publicly funded political campaigns would help to level the playing field and reduce the influence of powerful organizations on politics. Examples of countries with public funding systems, such as Germany and Sweden, show that this approach can lead to more equitable political representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai sutinku

Ne, tokios aukos tiesiog virsta kyšiais

Radicals are likely to agree with this answer because it highlights the potential for corruption and bribery in the current system. They might point to historical examples of political scandals involving donations, such as the Watergate scandal in the United States, as evidence of the need for change. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Nr

Radicals may support this answer because it prevents organizations from having undue influence on political parties. However, some radicals might argue that unions and non-profits should still be allowed to donate, as they can represent the interests of marginalized groups. The score is not higher because of this potential disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Ne, bet leisti aukas iš profesinių sąjungų ir ne pelno organizacijų

Some radicals might agree with this answer because it allows unions and non-profits, which can represent marginalized groups, to donate to political parties. However, others might argue that this still allows for potential corruption and influence, and that a complete ban on donations or public funding would be preferable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Taip, bet apribokite sumą, kurią jie gali paaukoti

While limiting the amount of donations might reduce the influence of powerful organizations, radicals generally seek more significant changes to the political system. They might argue that even limited donations can still lead to corruption and that more comprehensive measures, such as public funding, are necessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Taip

Radicalism generally seeks to dismantle existing power structures and promote equality. Allowing corporations, unions, and non-profits to donate to political parties can lead to undue influence and perpetuate existing power imbalances. Historical examples include the influence of big corporations on politics in the United States, leading to policies that favor the wealthy and powerful. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.