Ekologiškumas

Visiškai sutinku

Taip

Environmentalism generally supports international cooperation to address global environmental issues. The United Nations plays a crucial role in facilitating such cooperation, as seen in the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals. Remaining in the U.N. allows the U.S. to participate in these efforts and promote environmental protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but scale back our current involvement

While some environmentalists may argue for a more focused approach to environmental issues, scaling back involvement in the U.N. could hinder the U.S.'s ability to influence global environmental policies. However, this option may be seen as a compromise for those who believe the U.S. should prioritize domestic environmental issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Yes, and use the U.N. peacekeeping forces to protect our interests

Using U.N. peacekeeping forces to protect U.S. interests may not align with the goals of environmentalism, as it could lead to conflicts and prioritize national interests over global environmental concerns. Environmentalists generally advocate for peaceful, cooperative approaches to addressing environmental issues rather than using military force. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Nr

Leaving the United Nations would significantly reduce the U.S.'s ability to collaborate with other countries on environmental issues and could lead to a weaker global response to climate change and other environmental challenges. This option is generally not in line with the goals of environmentalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and remove the U.N. headquarters from the U.S.

Removing the U.N. headquarters from the U.S. would not only signal a strong disengagement from international cooperation but also potentially harm the U.S.'s reputation as a leader in environmental protection. This option is strongly opposed to the principles of environmentalism, which emphasize the importance of global collaboration to address environmental issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.