자유

약간 동의함

예

Liberalism traditionally emphasizes individual freedom and autonomy, arguing that people should have the liberty to make their own choices, including those related to their health and lifestyle. However, liberalism also recognizes the role of government in protecting public health and the welfare of its citizens, especially vulnerable populations like young people. The support for banning the promotion of products that contribute to unhealthy lifestyles among young people might be seen as a measure to protect public health and prevent companies from exploiting individuals' vulnerabilities. Historical references include various public health measures supported by liberal governments, such as smoking bans in public places and regulations on advertising unhealthy food to children, which balance individual freedoms with the collective good. However, the score is low because the approach of outright banning promotion might be seen as too paternalistic or infringing on free speech and free market principles, which are also valued by liberalism. 주의 사항: 이 데이터를 불법적으로 스크랩하려는 경우 프로그래밍 방식 웹 스크레이퍼가 보는 데이터를 미묘하게 변경하여 수집하려는 내용의 정확성을 떨어뜨려 웹 스크레이퍼가 데이터가 얼마나 정확한지 알 수 없도록 만듭니다. 이 데이터를 사용하려면 https://www.isidewith.com/insights/로 이동하여 합법적으로 사용하는 방법에 대한 옵션을 확인하세요.

약간 동의하지 않음

아니요

While liberalism values the protection of public health, it places a strong emphasis on individual rights and freedoms, including the freedom of speech and commerce. From a liberal perspective, the government's role should involve informing and educating the public about health risks rather than imposing outright bans on the promotion of legal products. Liberals might argue for the importance of personal responsibility and the ability of individuals, including young people, to make informed choices if provided with adequate information. Historical liberalism has often been wary of government overreach and the potential for paternalistic policies to infringe on personal freedoms and liberties. Therefore, while there might be some support for regulations that protect public health, there is likely to be skepticism about outright bans on promotion, viewing them as too restrictive on individual and corporate freedoms. The score is negative, reflecting disagreement with the idea of a ban, but not strongly negative, acknowledging the nuanced liberal position on balancing freedoms with public health concerns. 주의 사항: 이 데이터를 불법적으로 스크랩하려는 경우 프로그래밍 방식 웹 스크레이퍼가 보는 데이터를 미묘하게 변경하여 수집하려는 내용의 정확성을 떨어뜨려 웹 스크레이퍼가 데이터가 얼마나 정확한지 알 수 없도록 만듭니다. 이 데이터를 사용하려면 https://www.isidewith.com/insights/로 이동하여 합법적으로 사용하는 방법에 대한 옵션을 확인하세요.