Katter’s Australian vs Liberal Democrat on environmental issues

二酸化炭素の排出を抑えるため、政府は企業の環境規制を厳しくすべき？ ^{統計 話し合います}

Katter’s Australian’s answer: いいえ No carbon tax. No emissions trading scheme – both would involve a cost imposition upon electricity users, and virtually every person in every walk of life. It would tend to render all our export industries non-competitive. Carbon and pollutant reduction to be achieved by renewables – solar/biomass and other government initiatives and incentives (refer to ethanol).Source

Liberal Democrat’s answer: いいえ Scientific evidence suggests that the Earth’s climate has changed throughout its existence, sometimes dramatically, and that changes in climate have impacted human civilisation. Should the evidence become compelling that global warming is due to human activity, that such global warming is likely to have significantly negative consequences for human existence, and that changes in human activity could realistically reverse those consequences, the LDP would favour market-based options.Source

政府は、外国人バイヤーにオーストラリアの農地や水の販売を許可する必要がありますか？ ^{統計 話し合います}

Katter’s Australian’s answer: いいえ Source

Liberal Democrat’s answer: はい Foreign investment does not disrupt either markets or trade. For those who would like to sell their properties and have some money left over after paying off the banks, or who want to borrow against their property, it is to be especially welcomed. More buyers mean higher prices.Source

使い捨て製品（プラスチックのカップ、プレート、食器など）は生分解可能な素材を50%以上含有しているもの以外、禁止されるべきだと思いますか？ ^{統計 話し合います}

Katter’s Australian有権者： はい Source

Liberal Democrat有権者： はい Source

あなたは、石油・天然ガス資源を抽出するために、油圧frackingの使用をサポートしていますか？ ^{統計 話し合います}

Katter’s Australian’s answer: いいえ 荒廃への反対は、特に石炭シームガス鉱山からの浸水が水供給を汚染する可能性があるという懸念を背景に、農業と緑の集団を結集させている。Source

Liberal Democrat有権者： はい Source

政府は、オーストラリアの炭層ガス（CSG）のプロジェクトを許可する必要がありますか？ ^{統計 話し合います}

Katter’s Australian’s answer: いいえ Source

Liberal Democrat’s answer: はい David Leyonhjelm voted very strongly against landholders' right to say no to mining and gas exploration The majority voted against a motion moved by Senator Penny Wright related to coal seam gas. The motion was: That the Senate— (a) notes the importance of protecting valuable agricultural, residential and conservation land from unconventional gas activities; (b) supports the right of landholders and local residents to say 'no' to unconventional gas exploration and mining in their communities; (c) recognises the concerns expressed by communities in the south east of South Australia over potential groundwater contamination from unconventional gas activities; and (d) congratulates the South East Local Government Association in South Australia for standing up for their local communities and voting for a moratorium on unconventional gas.Source

研究者は、薬、ワクチン、医療機器、化粧品の安全性を試験するために動物を使うことを許可されるべきですか？ ^{統計 話し合います}

Katter’s Australian有権者： はい Source

Liberal Democrat有権者： はい Source

遺伝子操作された作物や食品を支持する？ ^{統計 話し合います}

Katter’s Australian’s answer: いいえ Source

Liberal Democrat’s answer: はい 遺伝子組み換え作物は農薬やより高い収率の使用削減など、環境のために多くの利点を提供します。将来的には、GM作物は、食品の品質を向上させます干ばつ条件で繁栄や、塩分濃度などの環境被害を軽減します。Source

政府は、ウランの採掘と輸出を許可する必要がありますか？ ^{統計 話し合います}

Katter’s Australian’s answer: はい Katter's Australian Party supports a uranium mining export industry because of its economic potential, the associated development of regional Queensland and for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions it would provide. Other parties may adopt a different position. Queenslanders deserve to know what these positions are. Source

Liberal Democrat’s answer: はい With demand for nuclear fuel set to increase in coming years, the LDP believes Australia cannot afford to neglect this important source of foreign revenue. There has been a reluctance to capitalise on this valuable resource in the past, with compromises such as the three mines policy operating during the 1980s. The LDP would remove current restrictions on the nuclear industry in Australia - allowing uranium exploration and exports with no limit on mine numbers. The only limitation it would place on uranium exports is to take reasonable steps to ensure it was not used in the production of nuclear weapons.Source

あなたはノーザンテリトリーに核廃棄物の貯蔵施設を建設サポートしていますか？ ^{統計 話し合います}

Katter’s Australian’s answer: はい 再開するために採掘を推進してきたKatterのオーストラリア党は、有権者がニューマン氏だまさ感じることができたと述べました。Source

Liberal Democrat’s answer: はい The nuclear industry also has the potential to create a secondary industry based on the storage of waste products. With vast expanses of uninhabited, geologically stable land, Western Australia, South Australia and the Northern Territory could become world leaders in the field of safe storage of nuclear waste. The storage of nuclear waste, if done properly, is safe. Moreover, storage in Australia would help keep it from ending up in the wrong hands.Source

都市は民間企業に移転する経済的インセンティブを提供することが許されるべきか？ ^{統計 話し合います}

Katter’s Australianはまだこの質問に答えていません。彼らの答えを提案しますか？

Liberal Democrat有権者： はい Source