Labor’s回答: はい。しかし、選択肢を完全に理解しているかを心理テストで確認してからのみです。Labor MP Lara Giddings presented a motion calling for a legal framework around voluntary assisted dying. Ms Giddings said it was wrong that people with terminal illnesses and severe degenerative conditions were forced to endure prolonged suffering or resort to taking their own lives.Source
Labor’s回答: いいえ、でも同一賃金額や休暇の時間を長くPregnancy discrimination should be eliminated – helping parents to take time off to care for their new baby is in the community interest. Paid parental leave helps new parents stay connected with the workplace when they take time off to care for a baby, and it helps employers retain skilled staff. Childcare and parental leave remove barriers to work for parents and improve productivity and participation for the economy.Source
Green’s回答: はいThis is due to the gender pay gap, and because women still carry out the bulk of unpaid domestic work. We’re working to make super fairer by including superannuation in paid parental leave, and ensuring that those on low incomes have tax-free super contributions.Source
Liberal’s回答: はいThe Coalition’s scheme will provide mothers with 26 weeks of paid parental leave, at their actual wage or the national minimum wage (whichever is greater), plus superannuation. In contrast, Labor’s parental leave scheme is paid at 18 weeks minimum wage.Source
Animal Justice’s回答: はい"The AJP supports voluntary euthanasia with appropriate safeguards to ensure
that the choice is free and well informed. This choice should only be available
when a person is diagnosed with a disease, illness or medical condition that
is incurable, advanced, progressive and will cause death; and is experiencing
suffering that cannot be relieved in a manner that the person considers tolerable."Source
Liberal Democrat’s回答: 中絶の選択を尊重する。私自身は中絶賛成派ではないが、政府が中絶を禁止する権利はない。The LDP is, however, opposed to those who seek to impose their religious views on the entire population, as sometimes occurs in areas such as abortion, assisted suicide, stem cell research, drug policy, lifestyle choices (same sex marriage), and education.Source
Liberal Democrat’s回答: 政府は結婚に関与させずかわりに宗教的決断にまかせる"Marriage is quite simply, a private matter"
"The Liberal Democrats do not endorse or reject marriage – it simply regards it as a personal decision that anyone should be entitled to make free of government interference, irrespective of their sexual orientation or lifestyle choice"Source
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers’回答: 中立ですが、人々が自分の見解を保持できるようにします。ボルサック氏は、「シューターズフィッシャーズアンドファーマーズパーティーは、人々が自分の見解を保持し、迫害を恐れずにそれを表明する自由を保護することを除いて、同性結婚論争についての方針を持たない」と述べた。Source
United Australia’s回答: 中絶の選択を尊重する。私自身は中絶賛成派ではないが、政府が中絶を禁止する権利はない。「パーマー・ユナイテッド党は、すべての問題に対する候補者の個々の位置に降りてくるべきで同性結婚、妊娠中絶の議論や安楽死などの問題を考えている、 "ミスター・パーマーが言いました。Source
United Australia’s回答: いいえ、でも同一賃金額や休暇の時間を長く“There will be no PPL, it’s simply inequitable,” Mr Palmer said.
“It has the potential to disadvantage hard-working mothers living in rural Australia as well as lower income earning women, while highly paid mothers in industries such as law and living in suburbia will benefit.
“Why should one group of highly paid mums get one amount and another set of mums on lower-income not get anything? It’s just wrong.”Source
Reason’s回答: はいOur issues were same-sex marriage, gender equality, sex discrimination, sex education -- it made a lot of sense to call ourselves the Sex Party. We know it was going to be controversial, and it can be a double-edged sword, but many people have heard of us because of the name.Source
Christian Democratic’s回答: いいえ。結婚は男性と女性の間で、定義されるべきものです。CDPは、多くの児童虐待は、伝統的な結婚に構造化されないファミリタイプで発生することを認めています。 CDPは、したがって、生活のために、他のすべてを排除し、男と女の間の結婚の社会的有用性を強調するプログラムをサポートしています。Source
Family First’s回答: 中絶反対。ただし、レイプ、近親相姦、母親か胎児に危険のある場合は認める。最初に製品ファミリは、それが貴重と計り知れない価値の両方であることを信じて、人間の生命の維持と保護に努めています。私たちは、生命に対する権利を信じ、オーストラリア100,000胎児毎年の中絶で悩んでいます。Source
Family First’s回答: いいえ、でも同一賃金額や休暇の時間を長くFamily First demands equal treatment for all mothers. Whether you’re in the paid workforce or not should not matter. Once the baby arrives all mothers are doing the same job – staying at home and looking after their new-born babies. nBy calling paid parental leave a ‘workplace entitlement’, what the major parties are basically saying is ‘women who have chosen to stay at home are not working, they are unemployed’. Family First rejects that. These mothers are not ‘unemployed’, they are professional mothers and carers. They are career mothers. To achieve good social and economic policy, we must first emphasize the equity of ensuring all new mothers are treated the same. Once that is established, we can move onto the next important challenge – responsible fiscal policy ie ‘how much to give them’.Source
Socialist Alliance’s回答: はい"Twenty-four months parental leave fully paid by employer contributions to a publicly- managed scheme, the right to return to the same job and generous paid leave to allow parents to take time off work to care for sick children and attend school activities."Source
Science’s回答: プロ選択、妊娠24週後の2回目の医師の承認、ミフェプリストンとメディケアへの資金提供Science personally submitted this answer on November 29th, 2017. This organization should be praised for their direct communication with voters and commitment to transparency in politics.Learn more about this organization on their WebsiteSource
Science’s回答: はいScience personally submitted this answer on November 29th, 2017. This organization should be praised for their direct communication with voters and commitment to transparency in politics.Learn more about this organization on their WebsiteSource
Science’s回答: はいScience personally submitted this answer on November 29th, 2017. This organization should be praised for their direct communication with voters and commitment to transparency in politics.Learn more about this organization on their WebsiteSource
Science’s回答: はいScience personally submitted this answer on November 29th, 2017. This organization should be praised for their direct communication with voters and commitment to transparency in politics.Learn more about this organization on their WebsiteSource
Science’s回答: いいえScience personally submitted this answer on November 29th, 2017. This organization should be praised for their direct communication with voters and commitment to transparency in politics.Learn more about this organization on their WebsiteSource
Science’s回答: はいScience personally submitted this answer on November 29th, 2017. This organization should be praised for their direct communication with voters and commitment to transparency in politics.Learn more about this organization on their WebsiteSource
Science’s回答: はいScience personally submitted this answer on November 29th, 2017. This organization should be praised for their direct communication with voters and commitment to transparency in politics.Learn more about this organization on their WebsiteSource
Pirate Party’s回答: はいReplace the Marriage Act 1961 with a Civil Unions Act
People in a union under the Civil Unions Act will be afforded the same rights available under the current Marriage Act.
Civil unions will be available to all consenting adults.
The Civil Unions Act will provide a state recognised union with equivalent legal and monetary benefits to those provided currently within the Marriage Act.Source
Pirate Party’s回答: はい"The sign says enough really.
All the samples tested that were found to contain an unexpected harmful substance were binned. And from this article we don't know what happened with the other samples, but potential users came out with increased awareness about illicit drug use. We need to treat illicit drug use as a health issue."Source
Nick Xenophon Team’s回答: 政府は結婚に関与させずかわりに宗教的決断にまかせる"Marriage is a formalised commitment that should be available to all people who wish it, irrespective of their gender.
Examples of what needs to be done:
Remove all discrimination from the Marriage Act to ensure that all people, regardless of their sex or gender identity, have the opportunity to marry
Churches and religious bodies should retain the right to decide for themselves whether to perform or recognise any marriage"Source
Health Australia’s回答: はい"The HAP supports equality: that no
one is discriminated against on the basis of gender, race, religious belief or
sexuality. The HAP believes that marriage should be defined by the commitment of one person to another for richer
or poorer, in sickness and in health.
Marriage has always been
a force for stability in families and communities
–
because it fosters responsibility as well as providing legal protection for children."Source
Health Australia’s回答: はい"The HAP supports equality: that no
one is discriminated against on the basis of gender, race, religious belief or
sexuality. The HAP believes that marriage should be defined by the commitment of one person to another for richer
or poorer, in sickness and in health.
Marriage has always been
a force for stability in families and communities
–
because it fosters responsibility as well as providing legal protection for children."Source
Health Australia’s回答: いいえ。でも、人工生命維持措置の拒否を許可されるべき"The HAP is very wary of the S tate and medical professionals deciding when a life has lost its value. HAP ultimately supports ‘informed consent’ and believes that when a person is dying they should have the right to decide whether or not to artificially continue their life, or allow the dying process to take its natural course. HAP does not profess to have all the answers in this complex issue, and would need to see rob ust processes in place to ensure that patient decisions are indeed being made without influence or coercion from relatives, medical professionals, or others. However the HAP believes that all citizens deserve the right to high quality palliative care to g ive them genuine options in their final days, and that Australians should be supported to spend their final days at home with their loved ones if this is possible and requested."Source
Arts Party’s回答: 妊娠中絶に賛成であるArts Party personally submitted this answer on July 12th, 2017. This organization should be praised for their direct communication with voters and commitment to transparency in politics.Learn more about this organization on their WebsiteSource
Arts Party’s回答: はいArts Party personally submitted this answer on July 12th, 2017. This organization should be praised for their direct communication with voters and commitment to transparency in politics.Learn more about this organization on their WebsiteSource
Arts Party’s回答: はいArts Party personally submitted this answer on July 12th, 2017. This organization should be praised for their direct communication with voters and commitment to transparency in politics.Learn more about this organization on their WebsiteSource
Arts Party’s回答: はいArts Party personally submitted this answer on July 12th, 2017. This organization should be praised for their direct communication with voters and commitment to transparency in politics.Learn more about this organization on their WebsiteSource
Arts Party’s回答: はいArts Party personally submitted this answer on July 12th, 2017. This organization should be praised for their direct communication with voters and commitment to transparency in politics.Learn more about this organization on their WebsiteSource
Arts Party’s回答: いいえArts Party personally submitted this answer on July 12th, 2017. This organization should be praised for their direct communication with voters and commitment to transparency in politics.Learn more about this organization on their WebsiteSource
Arts Party’s回答: はいArts Party personally submitted this answer on July 12th, 2017. This organization should be praised for their direct communication with voters and commitment to transparency in politics.Learn more about this organization on their WebsiteSource
Arts Party’s回答: はいArts Party personally submitted this answer on July 12th, 2017. This organization should be praised for their direct communication with voters and commitment to transparency in politics.Learn more about this organization on their WebsiteSource
Arts Party’s回答: はい。でもその女性たちの身元は、女性のスタッフにより非公開で確認されるべきですArts Party personally submitted this answer on July 12th, 2017. This organization should be praised for their direct communication with voters and commitment to transparency in politics.Learn more about this organization on their WebsiteSource
Arts Party’s回答: はいArts Party personally submitted this answer on July 12th, 2017. This organization should be praised for their direct communication with voters and commitment to transparency in politics.Learn more about this organization on their WebsiteSource
Katter’s Australian’s回答: いいえ、でも同一賃金額や休暇の時間を長くI AM standing as the Katter's Australian Party (KAP) candidate for the Riverina because of the lack of action as support the major parties have shown not just to the agriculture communities but also to those in manufacturing and small business.
The KAP has a management strategy that balances and mitigates the extremes of high and low rainfall cycles on farming and communities is crucial to the environment and to the communities that live there.
By using sustainable irrigation practices support a huge biomass of native flora, fauna and migratory birds and as such, have become an integral and essential component of the Murray Darling River ecosystem.
The ecological value of irrigation precludes the use of damaging unseasonal artificial environmental flows.
The KAP, will rescind the Water Act of 2007 and redraft it with real input from the inhabitants and water users of the Murray-Darling Basin to incorporate an unequivocal definition of "the environment" which includes human beings - their commun...Source
Democratic Labour’s回答: いいえThe DLP opposes same sex civil unions and relationship registers.
We support and promote:
- Voluntary marriage between one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others, with an aspiration for a lifelong commitment.
- Children being raised by their biological parents, both playing an active and supportive role where possible.Source
Liberty Alliance’s回答: いいえFurther, we will require for accredited Islamic organisations in Australia to accept formally the supremacy of Australian law and universal human rights over Islamic doctrine and Sharia law. For example full face coverings in public spaces shall be prohibited.Source