Labor’s回答: はいFederal Labor has agreed to support new metadata laws with amendments.
"The government bill, which is expected to pass parliament by the end of next week, forces telecommunications companies to keep two years of customer data, such as the time and length of a phone call."Source
Liberal’s回答: はいThe three big powers given to the Australian Federal Police (AFP) or the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (ACIC) are:
Data Disruption Warrants
Account Takeover Warrants
Network Activity Warrants
A DATA DISRUPTION WARRANT enables the agencies to “add, copy, delete or alter” data on devices. And while it’s called a warrant, there is an emergency authorisation process for cases when it is “not practicable” to get a warrant. So a data disruption “warrant” can be issued under something referred to as an emergency authorisation; a new power which the PJCIS insisted in their report should be reserved for a superior court judge. This was ignored and so emergency authorisations remain — which means that Australia now has a warrantless surveillance regime on the books.Source
Science’s回答: 令状でのみScience personally submitted this answer on November 29th, 2017. This organization should be praised for their direct communication with voters and commitment to transparency in politics.Learn more about this organization on their WebsiteSource
Arts Party’s回答: はい、しかし、司法または他の独立機関からの承認後Arts Party personally submitted this answer on July 12th, 2017. This organization should be praised for their direct communication with voters and commitment to transparency in politics.Learn more about this organization on their WebsiteSource