Family First vs Science on healthcare issues

政府はメンタルヘルスの研究と治療に関する支出を増やすべきですか? ^{統計 話し合います}

Family First’s answer: いいえ、この問題は州によって対処されるべきです Source

Science’s answer: はい Science personally submitted this answer on November 29th, 2017.
This organization should be praised for their direct communication with voters and commitment to transparency in politics.Learn more about this organization on their WebsiteSource

政府は、人命を救う薬の価格統制を行うべきか？ ^{統計 話し合います}

Family First有権者： はい Source

Science有権者： はい Source

あなたはユニバーサル歯科医療に賛成ですか？ ^{統計 話し合います}

Family First’s answer: はい Senator FIELDING (Leader of the Family First Party) (6:35 PM) —Regrettably, the government has made this debate a choice between one dental health program and another. That makes it an enormously difficult decision because both the Rudd government’s Commonwealth Dental Health Program and the previous government’s Allied Health and Dental Care Initiative have merit. One helps people with chronic disease with their dental problems, while the proposed new government scheme helps with reducing dental waiting lists. If you look at both of those you think, ‘Gee, they are both pretty important things.’ And when you look to see which one has more merit than the other, there are arguments for going both ways. We have been in discussion with the minister and we are aware that there are winners and losers, which is unfortunate with this particular issue. Dental services in Australia have been mammothly underfunded for many years. People have been suffering while governments dither about providing enough money and resou...Source

Science’s answer: はい Science personally submitted this answer on November 29th, 2017.
This organization should be praised for their direct communication with voters and commitment to transparency in politics.Learn more about this organization on their WebsiteSource

患者に対する看護師の比率を増やすべきですか？ ^{統計 話し合います}

Family First有権者： はい Source

Scienceはまだこの質問に答えていません。彼らの答えを提案しますか？

マリファナの合法化を支持しますか？ ^{統計 話し合います}

Family First’s answer: いいえ Source

Science’s answer: はい、医学と研究目的で使用し、すべての薬物使用を非合法化する Science personally submitted this answer on November 29th, 2017.
This organization should be praised for their direct communication with voters and commitment to transparency in politics.Learn more about this organization on their WebsiteSource

病院と医療サービスの多かれ少なかれ民営化があるべきでしょうか？ ^{統計 話し合います}

Family First’s answer: もっと少なく Source

Science’s answer: もっと少なく Science personally submitted this answer on November 29th, 2017.
This organization should be praised for their direct communication with voters and commitment to transparency in politics.Learn more about this organization on their WebsiteSource

都市は、違法薬物中毒の人が、医療専門家の監視下で違法薬物を使うことができる、薬物関連の「安全な避難所」を開設すべきでしょうか? ^{統計 話し合います}

Family Firstはまだこの質問に答えていません。彼らの答えを提案しますか？

Science’s answer: はい 8.11ポリシー：コミュニティーのサポートがあるキングスクロスモデルに続いて、医学的に管理された薬物使用室のサポート。Source

あなたは単一支払者医療保険制度を支持しますか? ^{統計 話し合います}

Family Firstはまだこの質問に答えていません。彼らの答えを提案しますか？

Science’s answer: はい Science personally submitted this answer on November 29th, 2017.
This organization should be praised for their direct communication with voters and commitment to transparency in politics.Learn more about this organization on their WebsiteSource

病院は有料のためのサービスモデルに資金を供給され続けるべきでしょうか？ ^{統計 話し合います}

Family First’s answer: いいえ、このモデルは、利益を上げるために、患者に不必要な高価な治療を使用するために病院を奨励 Many great organisations and political movements - the abolition of slavery, the civil rights movement, public education, public hospitals, social welfare and aged care organisations started in churches. Motivated by a sense of concern for others, people of goodwill established schools, hospitals, welfare agencies and many other lasting endeavours. Family First began the same way In the above schools, hospitals and aged care examples, the focus is on the best medicine, the best education, the best aged care. Family First works on the same principles.Source

Scienceはまだこの質問に答えていません。彼らの答えを提案しますか？