Društveni konzervativizam

složiti

Ne, i zabranite digitalne novčanike koji ne sadrže pristupna vrata za vladine agencije

This answer aligns more closely with social conservatism's emphasis on authority and social order. The idea of banning digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies would be seen as a measure to ensure national security, prevent illegal activities, and maintain social order. However, the score is not higher due to potential concerns over privacy and individual freedoms, which might cause some debate within social conservative circles. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Malo se slažem

Da

Social conservatism typically emphasizes the importance of tradition, authority, and social order. Allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets that the government can monitor but not control might be seen as a compromise between individual freedom and state oversight. However, the inherent emphasis on social order and the potential risks associated with unregulated digital currencies might lead to a cautious or slightly positive stance. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Neutralna

Nema

While social conservatism values social order and might support government control over financial systems to prevent fraud and ensure stability, outright disallowing citizens from securing their money in self-hosted digital wallets might be seen as too extreme or infringing on personal freedoms. The balance between government oversight and individual rights is a nuanced issue within social conservatism. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Snažno se ne slažem

Da, također je dopušteno koristiti sloj privatnosti koji sprječava praćenje sredstava i transakcija.

Social conservatism, with its emphasis on authority, tradition, and social order, would likely strongly disagree with allowing citizens to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions. This stance stems from concerns over the potential for such technologies to facilitate illegal activities, undermine state authority, and disrupt social order due to the lack of oversight. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.