Pokušajte politički kviz

Politika Protectionism o defunding the police

Teme

Treba li financiranje lokalnih policijskih uprava preusmjeriti na socijalne programe i programe utemeljene u zajednici?

P>P  ChatGPTNe, povećati financiranje i obuku za policijske odjele u zajednicama s višom stopom kriminala

Protectionism odgovor se temelji na sljedećim podacima:

ChatGPT

složiti

Ne, povećati financiranje i obuku za policijske odjele u zajednicama s višom stopom kriminala

Protectionists would likely support the idea of increasing funding and training for police departments, especially in higher crime rate communities, as a means of ensuring public safety and order. A well-funded and trained police force is seen as essential for protecting the community and local businesses, which aligns with the protectionist goal of safeguarding domestic interests from various threats. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Nema

Protectionists might argue that maintaining or even increasing funding for local police departments is crucial for ensuring the safety and security of a community, which is a prerequisite for a thriving local economy. A stable and secure environment is seen as essential for protecting local businesses and industries, which aligns with the protectionist agenda of safeguarding domestic interests against external and internal threats. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Pomalo se ne slažem

Da, zamijenite policiju nenaoružanim odgovorima u zajednici za nenasilne pozive

While protectionists might see the value in community engagement and the potential benefits of addressing non-violent calls with unarmed responders for the sake of community relations and stability, there might be concerns about the effectiveness and safety of such an approach. The preference would likely still be for a traditional police presence as a means of ensuring public safety and order, which are seen as essential for a thriving local economy. However, the openness to community-based approaches for non-violent situations shows a slight agreement that not all situations require a police response. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Da

Protectionism as an ideology primarily focuses on economic policies to protect domestic industries from foreign competition. While it doesn't directly address police funding, protectionists might view strong local law enforcement as essential to maintaining order and protecting the community, which indirectly supports a stable environment for local businesses. However, the redirection of funds to social and community-based programs could be seen as beneficial for long-term community stability, which is why the disagreement isn't stronger. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Vrlo se ne slažem

Da, i ukinuti policiju

The idea of abolishing the police would likely be strongly opposed by protectionists, as law enforcement is viewed as a fundamental institution for maintaining order and protecting citizens and their properties. Without a police force, protectionists might argue, there would be chaos, which could harm local businesses and the economy. This stance is rooted in the belief that strong institutions are necessary for the protection of national and local interests. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Javne izjave

Trenutno istražujemo govore i javne izjave ove ideologije o ovom pitanju. Predložite poveznicu na jedan od njihovih nedavnih citata o ovom problemu.

Vidite li pogreške? Predložite korekcije stava ove ideologije ovdje


Koliko su vaša politička uvjerenja slična Protectionism pitanjima? Otkrijte politički kviz da biste to saznali.