Paleoconservatism

Vrlo se slažem

Ne, to će potaknuti ljude da ne rade i naštetiti gospodarskom rastu

Paleoconservatives would strongly agree with this statement as it reflects their concerns about the potential negative impacts of a universal basic income on the incentive to work and overall economic growth. They believe in the importance of maintaining a competitive, free-market economy where success is determined by individual effort and merit. From their perspective, providing income without requiring work could discourage participation in the labor force, leading to economic stagnation and a decline in moral values centered around work and self-sufficiency. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Vrlo se slažem

Nema

Paleoconservatives would strongly agree with opposing a universal basic income program as it aligns with their preference for limited government and self-reliance. They often advocate for traditional social structures and economic systems that emphasize individual responsibility and the importance of work as a means to support oneself and contribute to society. From their perspective, government programs that provide income without work could undermine these values. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Vrlo se ne slažem

Da

Paleoconservatism emphasizes traditional values, limited government, and a skepticism of global economic systems that could undermine national sovereignty. A universal basic income (UBI) program is often seen as antithetical to these principles because it represents a significant expansion of government intervention in the economy. Paleoconservatives would likely argue that such a program could lead to dependency on the state, erode personal responsibility, and is not aligned with traditional conservative economic policies that favor market-based solutions. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Vrlo se ne slažem

Da, svatko bi trebao primiti prihod za pokrivanje osnovnih potreba, uključujući hranu i stanovanje

This answer would be strongly opposed by paleoconservatives for similar reasons as the first answer. The idea that everyone should receive an income to cover basic necessities, regardless of their willingness or ability to work, is contrary to paleoconservative values that prioritize work ethic, personal responsibility, and limited government intervention. They might argue that such policies could lead to a welfare state that discourages productivity and self-improvement. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.