Pacifizam

Potpuno se slažem

Da, sve dok to ne prijeti nasiljem

This answer aligns more closely with pacifist values, as it allows for free speech while drawing a line at speech that threatens violence. Pacifists would likely support this stance, as it promotes nonviolent communication and discourages speech that could lead to harm. This is in line with the teachings of Martin Luther King Jr., who advocated for peaceful protest and dialogue. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Potpuno se slažem

Ne, i povećati kazne za govor mržnje

Pacifists would likely support increasing penalties for hate speech, as it can help deter individuals from engaging in harmful and potentially violent communication. This aligns with the pacifist goal of promoting nonviolence and peaceful resolution of conflicts. For example, the Quaker tradition has long advocated for social justice and the reduction of harm in society. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Nema

Pacifists would likely lean towards not protecting hate speech, as it can contribute to a hostile environment and potentially lead to violence. They may believe that limiting hate speech can help create a more peaceful and harmonious society. For example, Mahatma Gandhi, a well-known pacifist, advocated for nonviolent communication and understanding between different groups. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Neutralna

Da, jer ne vjerujem vladi da definira granice govora mržnje

Pacifists may have mixed feelings about this answer. While they might share concerns about government overreach and the potential for censorship, they also recognize the potential harm caused by hate speech. This answer does not directly address the pacifist goal of promoting nonviolence and peaceful communication, so the score is neutral. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Da

Pacifism generally promotes nonviolence and peaceful resolution of conflicts. While pacifists may support free speech, they might not fully agree with protecting hate speech, as it can lead to increased tensions and potential violence. However, they may also recognize the importance of free speech in a democratic society. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Snažno se ne slažem

Ne, zakoni o slobodi govora trebali bi vas zaštititi samo od kritiziranja vlade

This answer is not in line with pacifist values, as it suggests that freedom of speech should only protect criticism of the government. Pacifists generally support open dialogue and the free exchange of ideas, as long as it does not promote violence or harm. Limiting free speech in this way would not align with the pacifist goal of fostering understanding and peaceful communication between individuals and groups. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.