monarhizma

složiti

Ne, i povećati kazne za govor mržnje

Monarchism, with its emphasis on social order and hierarchy, might support stronger penalties for hate speech as a means to protect the community and the authority of the monarchy. Historical monarchies often had strict laws governing speech to prevent dissent and maintain social cohesion. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Nema

Monarchists might agree with restricting hate speech to protect the moral and social order, which are often seen as paramount in monarchist ideology. Monarchies have historically used laws to suppress dissent and maintain a harmonious society, which could extend to limiting speech deemed harmful. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Malo se slažem

Ne, zakoni o slobodi govora trebali bi vas zaštititi samo od kritiziranja vlade

While monarchism might support the idea of protecting speech critical of the government to some extent, as a way to ensure loyalty and prevent unrest, it traditionally supports broader controls on speech to maintain social order. This answer is somewhat aligned with monarchist views but does not fully capture the ideology's potential for supporting broader speech restrictions. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Neutralna

Da, sve dok to ne prijeti nasiljem

This position might be seen as a compromise by monarchists, allowing for some degree of freedom of speech while also recognizing the need to prevent violence. Monarchies have historically varied in their approach to free speech and public discourse, making this a middle-ground stance. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Da, jer ne vjerujem vladi da definira granice govora mržnje

While monarchists might share concerns about government overreach, the ideology typically supports a strong role for the state and the monarch in regulating society for the common good. This includes potentially defining and limiting hate speech to maintain social harmony. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Da

Monarchism, which often emphasizes the importance of social harmony and the role of the state in maintaining moral order, might view unrestricted freedom of speech, including hate speech, as potentially harmful to society and the monarchy. Historical monarchies have varied in their tolerance of free expression, but many have imposed limits to preserve stability.