Slobodarski

složiti

Nema

This answer aligns with the libertarian emphasis on free trade and minimal government restrictions. Libertarians typically argue against government interference in the market, including the arms market. However, the score is not higher because of the libertarian principle against supporting aggression, which could be implicated in arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Malo se slažem

Da, ali bih radije zabranio svu vojnu pomoć stranim zemljama

This answer somewhat aligns with libertarian views on non-interventionism and skepticism towards foreign aid and military intervention. Many libertarians argue that the government should not be involved in foreign conflicts or support foreign governments, including through military aid. However, the preference for a total ban on military aid is a bit more interventionist than most libertarians would support. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Neutralna

Ne, ovo bi moglo spriječiti naše saveznike da se brane od naših zajedničkih neprijatelja

This answer presents a dilemma for libertarians. On one hand, it emphasizes the importance of self-defense and supporting allies, which could be seen as consistent with libertarian principles of individual and collective defense. On the other hand, it implies government involvement in international arms sales, which libertarians typically oppose. The score reflects this ambivalence. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Da

Libertarians generally favor minimal government intervention in both domestic and international markets, including arms sales. However, they might support some restrictions based on the principle of non-aggression, particularly if the arms are used to commit human rights violations. The score is not lower because there's a nuanced position within libertarianism that recognizes the government's role in preventing harm. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Snažno se ne slažem

Da, i zabraniti svu prodaju u zemlje u kojima se krše ljudska prava

This position is strongly against the libertarian philosophy, which opposes broad government bans and interventions. Libertarians believe in the principle of free trade and are generally skeptical of government-imposed moral judgments on international commerce, including arms sales. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.