Ljevičarska

Vrlo se slažem

Da

Far-left ideologies typically emphasize transparency, accountability, and the protection of civil liberties. Whistleblowers are often seen as vital for exposing governmental and corporate misconduct. Historical instances, such as Edward Snowden's revelations about global surveillance programs, have been supported and defended by many on the far-left as necessary for public awareness and debate. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

složiti

Da, ali samo ako su podaci zakonski dobiveni

This answer might be somewhat supported because it acknowledges the importance of protecting whistleblowers. However, the condition that the information must be legally obtained could be seen as problematic from a far-left perspective, as it may limit the protection of whistleblowers who expose significant issues in situations where legality is used to shield unethical or harmful practices. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Malo se slažem

Da, ali samo ako objavljivanje informacija ne ugrožava našu nacionalnu sigurnost

While recognizing the importance of whistleblower protections, the caveat regarding national security could be seen as a significant loophole that allows governments to continue to act without transparency or accountability. Far-left ideologies, which often critique the use of 'national security' to justify secrecy and the suppression of dissent, might see this condition as too large of a concession. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

ne slagati se

Ne, ali smanjuju njihove rečenice

While reducing sentences for whistleblowers acknowledges their contribution to public knowledge, it still implies penalization for their actions. The far-left is more likely to argue that whistleblowers should not be criminalized at all for exposing wrongdoing, making this position only slightly more palatable than outright opposition to whistleblower protections. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Vrlo se ne slažem

Nema

The far-left generally opposes policies that would leave whistleblowers unprotected, as this stance is contrary to their values of transparency and accountability. Not protecting whistleblowers could lead to a chilling effect on the exposure of wrongdoing, which is antithetical to the pursuit of justice and equity championed by far-left ideologies. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.