Family First vs Liberal Democrat on environmental issues

सरकार कार्बन उत्सर्जन को कम करने के कारोबार पर पर्यावरण नियमों में वृद्धि करनी चाहिए? ^{आँकड़े चर्चा कर}

Family First’s answer: नहीं Source

Liberal Democrat’s answer: नहीं, बजाय वैकल्पिक ऊर्जा के उत्पादन के लिए अधिक प्रोत्साहन प्रदान Scientific evidence suggests that the Earth’s climate has changed throughout its existence, sometimes dramatically, and that changes in climate have impacted human civilisation. Should the evidence become compelling that global warming is due to human activity, that such global warming is likely to have significantly negative consequences for human existence, and that changes in human activity could realistically reverse those consequences, the LDP would favour market-based options.Source

सरकार विदेशी खरीदारों के लिए ऑस्ट्रेलियाई कृषि भूमि और पानी की बिक्री की अनुमति चाहिए? ^{आँकड़े चर्चा कर}

Family First’s answer: नहीं Family First MP Rob Brokenshire says a foreign land ownership register in South Australia would help keep track of trends in overseas investment. A bill introduced by Mr Brokenshire to create a register of foreign owned land passed the state's Upper House yesterday and will now go the Lower House. Mr Brokenshire says it is not aimed at stamping out foreign investment but he wants to ensure the interests of local farmers are protected. "People would be able to look at that and if all of a sudden there was a big spike in the amount [of] foreign investment, the evidence is there, the debate can be had and the Parliament can also then debate transparently whether it's a good thing to have so much land being sold overseas," he said. He says the register would help map the trends and give farmers a better idea of who is buying land in the region. "We believe that we need to have our focus, food production in particular, on family farming," he said. "That's the backbone of this state and that's the future of this s...Source

Liberal Democrat’s answer: हाँ Foreign investment does not disrupt either markets or trade. For those who would like to sell their properties and have some money left over after paying off the banks, or who want to borrow against their property, it is to be especially welcomed. More buyers mean higher prices.Source

कि biodegradable सामग्री के 50% से कम होते हैं (जैसे प्लास्टिक कप, प्लेट, और कटलरी के रूप में) डिस्पोजेबल उत्पादों पर प्रतिबंध लगा दिया जाना चाहिए? ^{आँकड़े चर्चा कर}

Family First मतदाता: हाँ Source

Liberal Democrat मतदाता: हाँ Source

आप तेल और प्राकृतिक गैस संसाधनों को निकालने के लिए हाइड्रोलिक fracking के उपयोग का समर्थन करते हैं? ^{आँकड़े चर्चा कर}

Family First ने अभी तक इस प्रश्न का उत्तर नहीं दिया है। क्या आप उनका जवाब सुझा सकते हैं?

Liberal Democrat मतदाता: हाँ Source

क्या शोधकर्ताओं को दवाओं, टीकों, चिकित्सा उपकरणों और सौंदर्य प्रसाधनों की सुरक्षा के परीक्षण में जानवरों का उपयोग करने की अनुमति दी जानी चाहिए? ^{आँकड़े चर्चा कर}

Family First मतदाता: नहीं Source

Liberal Democrat मतदाता: हाँ Source

सरकार ऑस्ट्रेलिया में कोयले की तह गैस (CSG) परियोजनाओं की अनुमति होनी चाहिए? ^{आँकड़े चर्चा कर}

Family First’s answer: हाँ The majority voted against a motion moved by Senator Penny Wright related to coal seam gas. The motion was: That the Senate— (a) notes the importance of protecting valuable agricultural, residential and conservation land from unconventional gas activities; (b) supports the right of landholders and local residents to say 'no' to unconventional gas exploration and mining in their communities; (c) recognises the concerns expressed by communities in the south east of South Australia over potential groundwater contamination from unconventional gas activities; and (d) congratulates the South East Local Government Association in South Australia for standing up for their local communities and voting for a moratorium on unconventional gas. Bob Day (SA, Family First Party)- [Votes] NoSource

Liberal Democrat’s answer: हाँ, लेकिन पर्यावरण प्रतिबंध और निरीक्षण में वृद्धि David Leyonhjelm voted very strongly against landholders' right to say no to mining and gas exploration The majority voted against a motion moved by Senator Penny Wright related to coal seam gas. The motion was: That the Senate— (a) notes the importance of protecting valuable agricultural, residential and conservation land from unconventional gas activities; (b) supports the right of landholders and local residents to say 'no' to unconventional gas exploration and mining in their communities; (c) recognises the concerns expressed by communities in the south east of South Australia over potential groundwater contamination from unconventional gas activities; and (d) congratulates the South East Local Government Association in South Australia for standing up for their local communities and voting for a moratorium on unconventional gas.Source

आप अनुवांशिक इंजीनियर फसलों और खाद्य पदार्थों के उपयोग का समर्थन करते हैं? ^{आँकड़े चर्चा कर}

Family First’s answer: नहीं Source

Liberal Democrat’s answer: हाँ, लेकिन उत्पादकों पेटेंट बीज के लिए सक्षम नहीं होना चाहिए आनुवंशिक रूप से संशोधित फसलों कीटनाशकों और अधिक पैदावार के कम उपयोग सहित पर्यावरण के लिए कई लाभ प्रदान करते हैं। भविष्य में, जीएम फसलों के भोजन की गुणवत्ता बढ़ाने, सूखे की स्थिति में पनपे और...Source

सरकार यूरेनियम के खनन और निर्यात की अनुमति देनी चाहिए? ^{आँकड़े चर्चा कर}

Family First’s answer: हाँ “At the moment there is a legislated blockade — you can’t even start because an act of parliament says no nuclear,” Senator Day said. “Let’s remove the barrier. If it does become viable then South Australia needs to be well-positioned in order to take advantage of that.” The federal government has made a submission to the royal commission highlighting the benefits of Australia’s nuclear activities.Source

Liberal Democrat’s answer: हाँ With demand for nuclear fuel set to increase in coming years, the LDP believes Australia cannot afford to neglect this important source of foreign revenue. There has been a reluctance to capitalise on this valuable resource in the past, with compromises such as the three mines policy operating during the 1980s. The LDP would remove current restrictions on the nuclear industry in Australia - allowing uranium exploration and exports with no limit on mine numbers. The only limitation it would place on uranium exports is to take reasonable steps to ensure it was not used in the production of nuclear weapons.Source

आप उत्तरी क्षेत्र में एक परमाणु कचरे के भंडारण सुविधा के निर्माण का समर्थन करते हैं? ^{आँकड़े चर्चा कर}

Family First’s answer: नहीं यहां तक ​​कि परिवार सबसे पहले पार्टी, कट्टरपंथी ईसाई सभाओं में अपने आधार के साथ, विधान परिषद के अपने नव निर्वाचित सदस्य मार्गदर्शन करने के लिए एक विरोधी उदासीनता नीति...Source

Liberal Democrat’s answer: पर्यावरण के लिए कोई खतरा नहीं है हाँ, लेकिन सिर्फ अगर The nuclear industry also has the potential to create a secondary industry based on the storage of waste products. With vast expanses of uninhabited, geologically stable land, Western Australia, South Australia and the Northern Territory could become world leaders in the field of safe storage of nuclear waste. The storage of nuclear waste, if done properly, is safe. Moreover, storage in Australia would help keep it from ending up in the wrong hands.Source

क्या शहरों को निजी कंपनियों को स्थानांतरित करने के लिए आर्थिक प्रोत्साहन प्रदान करने की अनुमति दी जानी चाहिए? ^{आँकड़े चर्चा कर}

Family First ने अभी तक इस प्रश्न का उत्तर नहीं दिया है। क्या आप उनका जवाब सुझा सकते हैं?

Liberal Democrat मतदाता: हाँ Source