+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 617 Australia voters.

71%
Yes
29%
No
67%
Yes
24%
No
4%
Yes, and also increase spending for renewable energy and reforestation
2%
No, tax carbon emissions instead
1%
No, provide subsidies to renewable energy companies instead
1%
No, the government should invest in planting more trees to capture carbon instead

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 617 Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 617 Australia voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Australia voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B38QHJYanswered…5 days5D

No, tax emissions and invest in reforestation and land rehabilitation for environmental gain instead

 @B346JKPanswered…1wk1W

Yes but only if these companies are not using it to continue extracting and burning fossil fuels

 @B2WPBG9answered…3wks3W

It depends. 'Developing' a technology could be used as a dodge if they have no intention of doing anything with it. But if they're actually implementing it, then yes.

 @B2KWFG6from Kuala Lumpur  answered…1mo1MO

 @9WBCNY8answered…4mos4MO

No, but consider tax incentives for R&D projects independently address as viable with investing in

 @9V4LVQRanswered…5mos5MO

 @9SYC4SQanswered…6mos6MO

“ Carbon capture is not effective by itself, and especially not under capitalism where its very reason for existence of infinite economic growth on a planet with finite resources is unsustainable. Carbon capture should be a method used, but not the only one. It should work in conjunction with other methods of combating climate change. And it starts by destroying the thing that's destroying the earth... that being capitalism, and replace it with Marxism-Leninism, achieved through class struggle.” = thanks to eloquent comment.

 @9QZJSXKanswered…8mos8MO