Liberal Democrat vs United Australia on environmental issues

Bør regeringen øge miljøreguleringer på forretninger for at reducere karbonudslip? ^{statistik drøfte}

Liberal Democrat’s answer: Nej, giv flere incitamenter til alternativ energiproduktion i stedet Scientific evidence suggests that the Earth’s climate has changed throughout its existence, sometimes dramatically, and that changes in climate have impacted human civilisation. Should the evidence become compelling that global warming is due to human activity, that such global warming is likely to have significantly negative consequences for human existence, and that changes in human activity could realistically reverse those consequences, the LDP would favour market-based options.Source

United Australia’s answer: Nej, og den nuværende regering overregulerer forretninger Afskaffe Carbon...Source

Skulle regeringen tillade salg af australske land og vand landbruget til udenlandske købere? ^{statistik drøfte}

Liberal Democrat’s answer: Ja Foreign investment does not disrupt either markets or trade. For those who would like to sell their properties and have some money left over after paying off the banks, or who want to borrow against their property, it is to be especially welcomed. More buyers mean higher prices.Source

United Australia’s answer: Nej, vi skal beskytte arbejdspladser for vores landmænd Palmer United Party federal leader and Member for Fairfax Clive Palmer has applauded federal Treasurer Joe Hockey’s decision to reject the foreign takeover of GrainCorp...“GrainCorp shouldn’t be sold to foreign interests because it’s very important for the nation to retain the independence of its agricultural industry.”Source

Bør engangsmaterialer (så som plastikglas, tallerkener og bestik) som indeholder mindre end 50% bionedbrydeligt materiale banlyses? ^{statistik drøfte}

Liberal Democrat vælgerne: Ja Source

United Australia vælgerne: Ja Source

Har du understøtte brugen af ​​hydrauliske fracking at udvinde olie og naturgas ressourcer? ^{statistik drøfte}

Liberal Democrat vælgerne: Ja Source

United Australia har ikke besvaret dette spørgsmål endnu. Vil du gerne foreslå deres svar?

Skal forskere få lov til at bruge dyr til at teste sikkerheden af stoffer, vacciner, medicinsk udstyr og kosmetik? ^{statistik drøfte}

Liberal Democrat vælgerne: Ja Source

United Australia vælgerne: Nej Source

Skulle regeringen tillade Coal Seam Gas (CSG) projekter i Australien? ^{statistik drøfte}

Liberal Democrat’s answer: Ja, men øger miljørestriktioner og tilsyn David Leyonhjelm voted very strongly against landholders' right to say no to mining and gas exploration The majority voted against a motion moved by Senator Penny Wright related to coal seam gas. The motion was: That the Senate— (a) notes the importance of protecting valuable agricultural, residential and conservation land from unconventional gas activities; (b) supports the right of landholders and local residents to say 'no' to unconventional gas exploration and mining in their communities; (c) recognises the concerns expressed by communities in the south east of South Australia over potential groundwater contamination from unconventional gas activities; and (d) congratulates the South East Local Government Association in South Australia for standing up for their local communities and voting for a moratorium on unconventional gas.Source

United Australia’s answer: Ja, men øger miljørestriktioner og tilsyn Source

Støtter du brugen af gensplejsede afgrøder og fødevarer? ^{statistik drøfte}

Liberal Democrat’s answer: Ja, men producenter bør ikke have mulighed for at patentere frø Genetisk modificerede afgrøder tilbyder mange fordele for miljøet, herunder reduceret brug af pesticider og højere udbytter. I fremtiden vil GM-afgrøder forbedre fødevarekvalitet, trives i tørke og forbedre miljøskader såsom...Source

United Australia’s answer: Nej Source

Skulle regeringen tillade minedrift og eksport af uran? ^{statistik drøfte}

Liberal Democrat’s answer: Ja With demand for nuclear fuel set to increase in coming years, the LDP believes Australia cannot afford to neglect this important source of foreign revenue. There has been a reluctance to capitalise on this valuable resource in the past, with compromises such as the three mines policy operating during the 1980s. The LDP would remove current restrictions on the nuclear industry in Australia - allowing uranium exploration and exports with no limit on mine numbers. The only limitation it would place on uranium exports is to take reasonable steps to ensure it was not used in the production of nuclear weapons.Source

United Australia’s answer: Ja Source

Har du støtte opbygningen af ​​en affald lagerfacilitet nukleare i Northern Territory? ^{statistik drøfte}

Liberal Democrat’s answer: Ja, men kun hvis der ikke er nogen risiko for miljøet The nuclear industry also has the potential to create a secondary industry based on the storage of waste products. With vast expanses of uninhabited, geologically stable land, Western Australia, South Australia and the Northern Territory could become world leaders in the field of safe storage of nuclear waste. The storage of nuclear waste, if done properly, is safe. Moreover, storage in Australia would help keep it from ending up in the wrong hands.Source

United Australia vælgerne: Nej Source

Skal byer få lov til at tilbyde private virksomheder økonomiske incitamenter til at flytte? ^{statistik drøfte}

Liberal Democrat vælgerne: Ja Source

United Australia har ikke besvaret dette spørgsmål endnu. Vil du gerne foreslå deres svar?